On 2020-10-21 07:10, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
>
> I'll be waiting for any actual 'cypherpunk' or libertarian to shred
> donalds 'philosophy' to pieces. I think I'm going to wait a looong time.
The libertarian justification for controls on recreational drug use is
that drug abuse, vic
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 03:28:04PM +1000, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> We do not in fact have equality before the law, because actual equality
> before the law leads to intolerable consequences, because individuals,
> groups, and communities are not in fact equal, and require different laws.
Thank
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 04:07:27AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:28:04 +1000
> jam...@echeque.com wrote:
>
> > On 2020-10-21 07:10, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll be waiting for any actual 'cypherpunk' or libertarian to shred
> > > donalds 'philo
On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:37:07 PM PDT, jam...@echeque.com
wrote:
On 2020-10-21 07:10, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> I'll be waiting for any actual 'cypherpunk' or libertarian to shred
> donalds 'philosophy' to pieces. I think I'm going to wait a looong time.
[snip]
>We do n
> > We do not in fact have equality before the law, because actual equality
> > before the law leads to intolerable consequences, because individuals,
> > groups, and communities are not in fact equal, and require different laws.
No, this is handled by having multiple levels of jurisdiction, pushi
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 07:23:19PM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> > me:
> > >>> I'll be waiting for any actual 'cypherpunk' or libertarian to shred
> > >>> donalds 'philosophy' to pieces. I think I'm going to wait a looong
> > >>> time.
> >
> > donald:
> > >> We do not in fact have
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 10:53:30AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 07:23:19PM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> > > me:
> > > >>> I'll be waiting for any actual 'cypherpunk' or libertarian to
> > > >>> shred donalds 'philosophy' to pieces. I think I'm going to wait
> > I was simply pointing out how some people resist the idea of having
> > different laws for different people,
Bat Soup:
> yes, the people who 'resist' that idea are the libertarians.
> So what point are you trying to make, exactly?
You redefine libertarianism as progressivism. You a
On 2020-10-22 05:05, jim bell wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:37:07 PM PDT, jam...@echeque.com
> wrote:
>
> On 2020-10-21 07:10, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
>
>> I'll be waiting for any actual 'cypherpunk' or libertarian to shred
>> donalds 'philosophy' to pieces. I think I
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 09:42:46PM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:17:09 +1000
> jam...@echeque.com wrote:
>
>
> > The libertarian position on law is that there should be more private law
> > and less state law,
>
> no, that's the conservative/fascist/fake li
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 08:41:11PM -0500, John Newman wrote:
>
> > On Oct 21, 2020, at 19:35, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> >
> > I am pretty sure the great majority of blacks would inwardly want a gun
> > law specifically on blacks such as Bloomberg proposed, and a lot of them
> > would be so poli
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:39:19PM -0500, John Newman wrote:
>
> > On Oct 21, 2020, at 21:25, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 08:41:11PM -0500, John Newman wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 19:35, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I am pretty sure the great major
On 2020-10-22 11:41, John Newman wrote:
>> The majority of blacks favor laws on crack cocaine that clearly have,
>> and are clearly intended to have, disparate impact, and native Americans
>> support laws on alcohol that are barely wearing a fig leaf to disguise
>> their racial character.
> Do you
On 2020-10-22 11:41, John Newman wrote:
> Maybe you can find a high-dollar hooker, James, or a few of them,
> that will let you play out your fantasy of life in the Maghreb 1200
> years ago. Somehow I doubt even this would make you happy. You don't
> seem the type for happiness.
Every happy succes
On 2020-10-22 13:39, John Newman wrote:
> The differences between the sexes, Z*vomit*, does not mean one (the male, of
> which you
> at least pretend to be a member) should continue to rape, beat, murder, and
> otherwise
> do what the fuck ever
Women really don't like consent culture, and it is
> On Oct 21, 2020, at 19:35, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
>
> I am pretty sure the great majority of blacks would inwardly want a gun
> law specifically on blacks such as Bloomberg proposed, and a lot of them
> would be so politically incorrect as to outwardly favor it.
>
I'm pretty sure you are b
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 03:54:36AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:54:12 +1100
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> > You cannot nurture IQ into existence -
>
> 'IQ' is pseudo scientific bullshit. The fundamental fact is that
> morality has fuck to do with being cle
> On Oct 21, 2020, at 21:25, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 08:41:11PM -0500, John Newman wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 19:35, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
>>>
>>> I am pretty sure the great majority of blacks would inwardly want a gun
>>> law specifically on blacks such a
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 05:06:10AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:08:07 +1100
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 03:54:36AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> > > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:54:12 +1100
> > > Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:04:35PM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 19:33:18 +1100
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > > skin color is completely irrelevant for morality/politics, just like
> > > 'IQ'.
> >
> >
> > Keep arguing an unrelated point I see :)
>
>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 09:37:48PM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> The concept of 'race' is .. useless for any serious discussion about
> politics.
Your position that IQ is useless to any serious discussion about politics, is
in dispute.
> Now, by pretending to discuss 'race
On 2020-10-22 18:06, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> skin color is completely irrelevant for morality/politics, just like
> 'IQ'.
What is moral depends on one's reasonable and realistic predictions of
other people's behavior. For example under some circumstances it is
right to kill a stran
On 2020-10-23 10:37, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> Sorry I don't care about your racist nonsense. The concept of 'race' is
> based on some irrelevant traits like skin color and details about shape, and
> it's useless for any serious discussion about politics. Except of course for
> KKK m
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 04:25:51PM +1000, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> On 2020-10-23 10:37, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> > Sorry I don't care about your racist nonsense. The concept of 'race' is
> > based on some irrelevant traits like skin color and details about shape,
> > and it's useles
24 matches
Mail list logo
