Eric Cordian wrote:
> Now that the new standard for pre-emptive war is to murder the
> legitimate leader of another sovereign nation and his entire family,
> an "artist's rendering" of Shrub reaping what he sows would surely be
> an excellent political statement.
I am not sure these two were murder
John Kozubik wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>
>>> Where do these ridiculous ideas come from ? If I own a piece of
>>> private property, like an airplane (or an entire airline) for
>>> instance, I can impose whatever senseless and arbitrary conditions
>>> on your use of it
John Kozubik wrote:
> Where do these ridiculous ideas come from ? If I own a piece of
> private property, like an airplane (or an entire airline) for
> instance, I can impose whatever senseless and arbitrary conditions on
> your use of it as I please.
Not really - there are quite clear rules in
Anonymous wrote:
> Under the Hatch Doctrine, the computer that serves his web site
> at www.senate.gov/~hatch/, is a target for elimination. It appears
> that the Honorable Senator was using JavaScript code in violation
> of the license:
> http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,59305,00.html
> S
