> Mr. 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
> 7F5sYOSacEBhYOthmMajqjrXbEFeayL9k0nvy2Op
> 4ja6CgWweSZyFGYYZywMhffV8A6cZv0mLbhGTF1pE said: *grin*
> "Unmasking" is always disruptive, because one can never
> distinguish between
> an infiltrator or provocateur, and someone who
--
At 02:10 AM 4/4/2001 -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
> The one thing you DON'T want to do is encourage individual
> vigilantism "unmasking" and unfounded paranoia.
Hostile infiltration is common and highly effective within radical
political groups, and is routinely used not only by the govern
For cause-related groups, external and internal discreditation initiatives
are better strategies than an "informant." (In some respects, an "informant"
can be a GOOD THING.)
External: false attribution, mischaracterization.
Internal: breeding internal conflict by making you *think* you have an
i
