Faustine wrote:
> But still, fake framework and all,
> it can be useful if it gets you to
> clarify and articulate your own
> assumptions.
Yes, that's true, but for those of us who have spent long years watching the
world, examining our own assumptions and dealing with intellectual
challenges to
Faustine wrote:
> Heres a gaming scenario from Susan
> Stranges "States and Markets" (1988)
> called "Desert Island"...
>
> Any takers? :)
Count me out. The trouble with games theory is that the outcome is pretty
much dictated by the rules established by the game designer. It's
intuitively o
Quoting Sandy Sandfort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Faustine wrote:
>
> > Here's a gaming scenario from Susan
> > Strange's "States and Markets" (1988)
> > called "Desert Island"...
> >
> > Any takers? :)
>
> Count me out. The trouble with games theory is that the outcome is
> pretty
> much dictate
At 6:05 PM -0400 5/2/01, Faustine wrote:
>Quoting Sandy Sandfort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Count me out. The trouble with games theory is that the outcome is
>> pretty
>> much dictated by the rules established by the game designer. It's
>> intuitively obvious that the given scenarios are ar
--
At 06:05 PM 5/2/2001 -0400, Faustine wrote:
>Yep, good points. But still, fake framework and all, it can be useful if it
>gets you to clarify and articulate your own assumptions.
We have clarified and articulated our assumptions some considerable time
ago. You came in late.
--digsig
