hatever/
Second, ease of use. Many of the intended users of the secure phones
may not even be heavy users of computers, or may have various
machines not supported by SpeakFreely or other programs.
Third, integration of the Starium-type chipset in cellphones remains
the Big Win, right? What Pablo
ile SpeakFreely and figure
out how to get it to work". Starium is obviously the easiest to use.
Plug it in, press one button, you're done. However, with a small
dedicated PC or a PDA, it should be possible to get closer to what
Starium promises.
Obviously it would be ideal to hav
diate
>models between "bump in the cord" and "compile SpeakFreely and figure
>out how to get it to work". Starium is obviously the easiest to use.
>Plug it in, press one button, you're done. However, with a small
>dedicated PC or a PDA, it should be possible
ious
>machines not supported by SpeakFreely or other programs.
Yep, ease of use is a real problem.
>Third, integration of the Starium-type chipset in cellphones remains
>the Big Win, right?
Getting anything into a cell handset is the Big Win, yep.
What Pablo Escobar wants is a secure c
