At 06:32 PM 4/28/01 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>People don't need to spend several months wading through cryptography
>textbooks to come up to a level that is sufficient to understand the
>real issues.)
>
>
>--Tim May
In fact, crypto textbooks will teach you about the tensile strength
of steel, but
At 3:28 PM -0400 4/30/01, Faustine wrote:
>Quoting Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>> At 6:32 PM -0700 4/28/01, Tim May wrote:
>> >
>> >(You see, the "quick review" process is much better than the method
>> >you suggested re: economics, that people read the main textbooks.
>> >People don't
At 3:28 PM -0400 4/30/01, Faustine wrote:
>Quoting Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>> At 6:32 PM -0700 4/28/01, Tim May wrote:
>> >
>> >(You see, the "quick review" process is much better than the method
>> >you suggested re: economics, that people read the main textbooks.
>> >People don't
Quoting Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> At 6:32 PM -0700 4/28/01, Tim May wrote:
> >
> >(You see, the "quick review" process is much better than the method
> >you suggested re: economics, that people read the main textbooks.
> >People don't need to spend several months wading through
> >cryp
At 2:24 PM -0500 4/28/01, Aimee Farr wrote:
>Reading the IMC gag order, Henson, the latest anonymous poster stuff, and
>Tim et. al. beating my head in pavement
>
>Since many forums don't allow for 'nymity, (or people just don't), what
>about a protected/offshore self-destruct quicktopic-like s
At 6:32 PM -0700 4/28/01, Tim May wrote:
>
>(You see, the "quick review" process is much better than the method
>you suggested re: economics, that people read the main textbooks.
>People don't need to spend several months wading through
>cryptography textbooks to come up to a level that is suff
Tim May wrote:
>None of the non-cryptographic methods are very resistant to legal,
>technical, sniffing, and black bag attacks. And only multiply-chained
>encrypted-at-each-stage messages, a la remailers, are adequate for
>high-value messages.
Those who've read it know that Jim Bamford's "Bod
At 11:22 PM -0400 4/28/01, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:32:08PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
>> None of the non-cryptographic methods are very resistant to legal,
>> technical, sniffing, and black bag attacks. And only multiply-chained
>> encrypted-at-each-stage messages, a la r
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 08:49:43PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
> Well, better than nothing. (Like I said in another article tonight,
> "the best is often the enemy of the good.") We knew even in 1992 that
> "remailers" were a pale imitation of the DC Nets discussed a few
> years earlier by Chaum and
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> If only they worked. There was an interesting paper presented here
> in Pittsburgh at the info hiding workshop this week that suggested
> a way to strengthen the somewhat-suckful mixmaster network. (Of
That would be
"A Reputation System To Increa
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 06:32:08PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
> None of the non-cryptographic methods are very resistant to legal,
> technical, sniffing, and black bag attacks. And only multiply-chained
> encrypted-at-each-stage messages, a la remailers, are adequate for
> high-value messages.
If o
At 10:09 PM -0400 4/28/01, John Young wrote:
>
>Finally, reading the NYT account of Kerry's team killing the
>Vietnamese is sobering. The article is much more disturbing
>than accounts of it have portrayed. Kerry's and other killers'
>spin over the years have induced an intolerance for reading
>th
At 9:43 PM -0500 4/28/01, Aimee Farr wrote:
>Tim said:
>
> > * Keith Henson chose to post under his own name, to appear in person
>> at COS offices and recruiting centers, to picket, and so on. He was
>> not trying to be anonymous or pseudonymous, so your proposal above
>> would be pointless i
Tim said:
> At 2:24 PM -0500 4/28/01, Aimee Farr wrote:
> >Reading the IMC gag order, Henson, the latest anonymous poster stuff, and
> >Tim et. al. beating my head in pavement
> >
> >Since many forums don't allow for 'nymity, (or people just don't), what
> >about a protected/offshore self-des
I wrote:
---
If you plan to stay on this list, I think it's long past time that
you spend several hours reviewing past developments in these areas.
(You see, the "quick review" process is much better than the method
you suggested re: economics, that people read the main textbooks.
People don
Reading the IMC gag order, Henson, the latest anonymous poster stuff, and
Tim et. al. beating my head in pavement
Since many forums don't allow for 'nymity, (or people just don't), what
about a protected/offshore self-destruct quicktopic-like service:
http://www.quicktopic.com/7/H/Kf6X7D9whDP
16 matches
Mail list logo
