At 2:24 AM -0400 8/30/00, Mark Murray wrote:
> > Would a public PRNG (Yarrow?) server be of any use? I suppose it could be
>> done as a proof-of-concept, or as another source of entropy for an internal
>> PRNG... and the trust issue could be dealt with just as you deal with the
>> Intel PRNG.
>Greg Newby wrote:
>>
>> I was forced to remove my copy of the DeCSS code this spring by UNC as
>> a result of a complaint by the MPAA.
>>
>> Now, the MPAA is trying to force me to remove a LINK to the code from
> > my class page. This is enough to make me want to throw up.
>
Look, you say
THIS IS ABOUT MONEY
and this is REAL
IF YOU WANT IT
HOW AND WHERE TO GET IT NOW
Let me give you a little idea
.SELLING PRODUCTS AND
SERVICES HAVE BEEN WASTING YOUR TIME! And
IM WILLING
TO BET THEY HAVENT MADE YOU THE KIND OF MONEY YOU
HAD HOPED FOR, EITHER
SO
Im going to tell you a sho
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 04:33:04PM -0400, David Honig wrote:
>
> At 04:09 PM 8/30/00 -0400, Greg Newby wrote:
> >I was forced to remove my copy of the DeCSS code this spring by UNC as
> >a result of a complaint by the MPAA.
> >
> >Now, the MPAA is trying to force me to remove a LINK to the code f
We'll see what UNC says. Their legal counsel is extremely
conservative, but luckily technically literate.
Of course, the main thing here is the principal. The link
is substantial to my class, and Kaplan's decision has no
bearing on N.C. (nor anyone else...).
BTW, more stuff on my spring incide
Greg Newby wrote:
>
> I was forced to remove my copy of the DeCSS code this spring by UNC as
> a result of a complaint by the MPAA.
>
> Now, the MPAA is trying to force me to remove a LINK to the code from
> my class page. This is enough to make me want to throw up.
Can you simply remove the
At 04:09 PM 8/30/00 -0400, Greg Newby wrote:
>I was forced to remove my copy of the DeCSS code this spring by UNC as
>a result of a complaint by the MPAA.
>
>Now, the MPAA is trying to force me to remove a LINK to the code from
>my class page. This is enough to make me want to throw up.
>
First,
I was forced to remove my copy of the DeCSS code this spring by UNC as
a result of a complaint by the MPAA.
Now, the MPAA is trying to force me to remove a LINK to the code from
my class page. This is enough to make me want to throw up.
-- Greg
- Forwarded message from Jeanne Smythe <[EM
YES!!! YES!!! I can't stop laughing...
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Stephan Kinsella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You can find this at:
>
> http://164.195.100.11/netahtml/srchnum.htm
> and search for the following number:
> 6,112,188
>
> (Or go to http://www.uspto.gov/patft/inde
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "sunder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Not to pull a Tim, but trawl through the old archives, there were huge
> threads on this a long time ago, including schematics.
I know :) As I explained in my other post, my primary focus right now is not
to make something attacker-proof,
Tech Review Sept/Oct 2000
p 34 G Pascal Zachary
"Tools such as MP3 and MP4 should be banned
Any ban on a software tool will spawn illegal traffic
in that tool..."
from a column called, amazingly, "Inside Innovation"
Fortunately this dinosaur twit has only his opinion and a few column
inch
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26278-2000Aug25.html
---
All inventions or works of authorship original to me,
herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public
domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose,
without permission, attribution, or notification.
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Adam Back" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You either have a private key, or you don't. If you don't you don't
> have any entropy to generate a key, and have no a way to securely
> converse with the PRNG server. If you do, you get computational
> security by feeding your privat
This guy thinks SDMI will work against MP3! Oh, and Freenet is a "rogue
program"...
http://www.pacificresearch.org/issues/tech/eclips/eclips0600.html
Mark
---
All inventions or works of authorship original to me,
herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public
domain, and may be used or m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> David Honig wrote on Tue, 29 Aug 2000:
>
> > The fathers of the two babies, Jacques Robidoux, the sect's reputed
> > leader, and David Corneau, are among eight sect members who are behind
> > bars for refusing to cooperate in the investigation.
>
> One wonders what
15 matches
Mail list logo
