A virus was detected in a message you sent

Re: Cypherpunks response to viral stimuli

Can a TLA please give some sign here, any sign - just ack that you know the list exists, otherwise the legitimacy of cpunks is definitely going down the drain. Looks like a Berlin wall syndrome. = end (of original message) Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this) spam follows:

[IP] Charging For E-Mail (fwd from dave@farber.net)

- Forwarded message from Dave Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Dave Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:34:41 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IP] Charging For E-Mail X-Mailer: munch X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.2.0 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] And

Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;ewmdcusa.ewmfg.com Received-From-MTA: dns;minder.net Arrival-Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 03:33:12 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mail Transaction Failed

The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. <>

[no subject]

data.cmd Description: Binary data

Internet.Com Format Error

Sorry, your email containing an attachment can not be distributed through Internet.Com discussion lists. The only acceptable format for posting to isp-asia is ASCII Text, with NO attachments. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on isp-asia.

MAIL TRANSACTION FAILED

test <>

Internet.Com Format Error

Sorry, your email containing an attachment can not be distributed through Internet.Com discussion lists. The only acceptable format for posting to isp-investor is ASCII Text, with NO attachments. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on isp-investor.

Japanese girl VS playboy

Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=Params.richmedia=yes&Params[6].htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: PGEgdGFyZ2V0PSJfbmV3IiBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vYWRzLmFzNHgudG1jcy5uZXQvZXZlbnQu bmcvVHlwZT1jbGljayZGbGlnaHRJRD0zODIwMyZBZElEPTUwOTQyJlRhcmdldElEPTE1Mjcm U2VnbWVudHM9MTA0M

Re: Cypherpunks response to viral stimuli

On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 05:23:02PM -0800, Bill Stewart wrote: > Five or ten years ago, when the Feds were still pretending to be in > control of crypto, crypto enthusiasts were still a threat - these days you > can pick up VPN boxes at the grocery store, and if they still care about > us, they're

[no subject]

The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. <>

Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP error from remote mailer after end of data: host mail.so

hi

<>

Mail System Error - Returned Mail

This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason: Each of the following recipients was rejected by a remote mail server. The reasons given by the server are included to help you determine why each recipient was rejected. Recipient: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reason:[EMAIL PROTECTED

hi

<>

Error

<>

[no subject]

<>

failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at 211-255-52-6.rev.krline.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1) --- Below

Failure Notice

Receiver:[EMAIL PROTECTED] No such user --- Begin Message --- <> --- End Message ---

Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;thmail.toohome.com Received-From-MTA: dns;minder.net Arrival-Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:36:33 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The Farewell Dossier

The New York Times February 2, 2004 OP-ED COLUMNIST The Farewell Dossier By WILLIAM SAFIRE ASHINGTON Intelligence shortcomings, as we see, have a thousand fathers; secret intelligence triumphs are orphans. Here

Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;mail.apawood.org Received-From-MTA: dns;minder.net Arrival-Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:05:48 -0800 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] A

Undeliverable Mail

User mailbox exceeds allowed size: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original message follows. Received: from minder.net [219.133.113.224] by cemail-4 with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.07) id A969A6032A; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 00:16:41 +0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Hello Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 23:

Re: Cypherpunks response to viral stimuli

Tyler Durden wrote: And in case it's not clear, I'm suggesting that it may be useful for them to deliberately create a "fake" virus that is easily detectable, and so cull the bounce messages. Right, why should they do something passive that doesn't tip their hand and allows them to collect the

MDaemon Warning - Virus Found

The following message had attachment(s) which contained viruses: >From : [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject : Date : Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:46:43 -0500 Message-ID: AttachmentVirus name Action taken --

[no subject]

The message sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject: ... contained a virus and has been blocked. Please check your systems.

Hi

The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment. <>

Re: Cypherpunks response to viral stimuli

"Or would you instead, simply just stick a Carnivore machine at one hop above each CDR node that you're interested in, and gather the information you wanted with nearly zero risk of tipping your hand? Or even simpler than that, get a hotmail or yahoomail account and just subscribe. Which of th

List Post failure

Your posting to the list [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been returned to you because you are not a member of the list. Only members of this list are allowed to post to it. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have any probl

Undeliverable: HI

Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HI Sent:Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:24:18 -0700 did not reach the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:23:31 -0700 The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= az;p=sta

RE: Email you sent to rthompson@domce.com

To counterract SPAM, Dominion requests you confirm your first message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], by clicking on the link below . . . http://mail.domce.com/verify.asp?messageid=A586CD97AEEF7A43A4225EBACB44F73D Subject: Hi Date / Time: 2/3/2004 3:35:30 PM You will need to repeat this task the first ti

[IP] Bruce Schneier on ID cards and the "illusion of security" (fwd from dave@farber.net)

- Forwarded message from Dave Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Dave Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 15:28:45 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IP] Bruce Schneier on ID cards and the "illusion of security" X-Mailer: munch X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6

Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you se nt.

Recipient of the attachment: Randy Thompson\Inbox Subject of the message: Hi No action was taken on the attachment. Attachment body.zip was Logged Only for the following reasons: Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005) <>

[IP] Are terrorists using encryption to cloak their secrets? (fwd from dave@farber.net)

- Forwarded message from Dave Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Dave Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 15:26:52 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IP] Are terrorists using encryption to cloak their secrets? X-Mailer: munch X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0

Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;ewmdcusa.ewmfg.com Received-From-MTA: dns;minder.net Arrival-Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:01:48 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]

failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at hknet.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) --- Below this line is a copy of the

Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;qsmcms1.quantacn.com Received-From-MTA: dns;minder.net Arrival-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:04:25 +0800 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTE

failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at hknet.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) --- Below this line is a copy of the

Your message to xmlsec awaits moderator approval

Your mail to 'xmlsec' with the subject TEST Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post by non-member to a members-only list Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's deci

Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP error from remote mailer after end of data: host mail.so