Harmon Seaver wrote:
If a member of a club, to which you belong, commits an act of
violence, are you liable for that act?
No, but if the club, as an entity, does such, you should be. If
the corporation pollutes, all and sundry owners and employees should
be equally liable. Or maybe
On 26 Mar 2004, Frog wrote:
Harmon Seaver wrote:
If a voluntary association injures me,
Associations - corporate or otherwise - are abstract, intangible
entities. They don't perform actions. People do.
Corporations act as legal persons - they can enter into contracts, own
assetts,
4002467709115577
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cypherpunks, We can beat any health insurance rates...
Get your personal q.uote by checking us out online.
Get your complimentary health insurance pricing now.
http://quickslickdeals.net/ins
User mailbox exceeds allowed size: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original message follows.
Received: from 027.net [219.133.113.131] by 027.net
(SMTPD32-7.11 ) id A08A18210160; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:22:34 +0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: read it immediately
Date: Fri, 26 Mar
At 11:44 AM + 3/26/04, Anonymous via panta wrote:
three rounds in the base of Bob Hettinga's geodesic skull
Glock for the bed. AR for the Closet. Mossberg for the door?
:-).
Collective punishment, indeed...
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
At 7:20 AM + 3/26/04, Justin wrote:
Those nasty latin words are ceteris paribus.
Thank you.
On a network full of experts the price of error is bandwidth.
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 9:48 PM -0800 3/25/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 09:20 PM 3/25/04 -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
Fine. Make it cheaper. Moore's Law creates geodesic networks, so
let's have geodesic internet bearer transactions.
Yesss! Its only taken a month or
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:32:43AM -0500, An Metet wrote:
From http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/36485.html :
To download the online picture, he used the Anonymizer.com service,
believing the companys privacy policy would protect him. Not so. Dutch
The article got it wrong. He used
Hi, Uuvor Cywqduw
White gir1z banged by black boyz.
http://distinctly.largest.kolbaska.com/1nterracialjoy/index.html
Delete mail
http://key.beds.kolbaska.com/index.html
checktill overseer trickling, glowing snow addressed.
partial birthdaythe dawn honest lap, reflected reflections.
charles
Variola wrote...
And BTW, what is wrong with hired police (mercs) esp. when the local
police don't work? Do you have a problem with private security guards
in the US, as long as they don't involve you in unconsensual transactions?
Do you have a
problem with weaponsbearing citizens, again, if
From The Register:
To download the online picture, he used the anonymising Surfola service
(and not Anonymiser.com as we mistakenly wrote in our initial report -
apologies to all concerned - Ed), believing the companys privacy policy
would protect him.
So now I don't know what to believe.
Today is a new day for your residence. With levels
at their headline-making historic lows, our programs
are better now than ever before. Even if you've recently
closed on a property, now is the time to check your
numbers.
Our advisors are here to help you decide your options.
In fact, did you
Attention Auto Owners
Purchase extended auto warranties at much lower prices than dealers sell them. Find
out how here:
http://www.1buy1.net/auto.php?lid=200cid=5206
Car troubles always seem to happen at the worst possible time.
Protect yourself and your loved ones with a quality Extended
They didn't say where to, exactly, but we can guess...
Cheers,
RAH
---
http://www.forbes.com/fyi/2004/0329/066_print.html
Forbes
EZPass
Welcome to the Fast Track
Matthew Reed Baker, 03.29.04
Airport security can be traveler's hell. If you've been waiting for a quick
pass, you may
At 9:30 PM -0500 3/24/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JUSTICE?
Yawn.
Plonk...
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
... however it may deserve respect
--
--553253168722646
Command '--553253168722646' not recognized.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Command 'content-type:' not recognized.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Command 'content-transfer-encoding:' not recognized.
New York Daily Journal
Str0ng Buy 12-month target 1.30
Nov CFTN at .40 High 2.62655%Gain
Dec HTSC at .70 High 3.25410%Gain
Jan QLHC at .90 High 3.50389%Gain
Feb CWTD at .90 High 8.50….800%Gain
Feb 27 CNLG at .84High 6.55..289%Gain
Mar1 MAMA 3.95 High 13.30...400%Gain
At 08:10 AM 3/26/04 -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 9:48 PM -0800 3/25/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
This recently occurred to me. There is a type of bearer document
which is exactly like cash (anonymous, finder's keepers/spenders)
*except*
that it expires. Its called a concert ticket.
Local cops busted somebody who threatened to derail some trains if he
won't get paid. That's a common news.
Less common, and more important, detail that the TV news reported confirms
the suspicion I had from the beginning of deployment of the prepaid cards
technology for local payphones.
Each
At 08:39 PM 3/26/04 -0600, Black Unicorn wrote:
Keeping calling cards from leaking information probably isn't possible.
Limiting the information leaked to that which is already known or is
useless
is probably the best bet. Using separate cards for separate
operations /
cells and immediate
At 12:41 AM 3/27/04 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yet one would've thought that a smart radical would have been able
to
purchase a measly couple of 50 lb bags of (NH4NO3) without having to
call
all over the place and brag about it, and for cash at that. You don't
want
it known, don't say
At 01:05 AM 3/27/04 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:51 PM 3/26/2004, Thomas Shaddack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suggested countermeasure: When true anonymity is requested, use the
card
ONLY ONCE, then destroy it.
Better yet, take another 10 minutes, get change from a laundromat, and
use
Get moving. No time to waste.
You may have already earned your
University Degree !
·
Too much experience and not
enough education?
·
Do you feel that you do not
get the respect or recognition you deserve?
Now it is time to do something about it. It is now time to get recognition for
The World Trade Organization, in its first decision on an
Internet-related dispute, has ignited a political, cultural and legal
tinderbox by ruling that the United States policy prohibiting online
gambling violates international trade law.
The ruling, issued by a W.T.O. panel on Wednesday, is
At 7:51 PM +0100 3/26/04, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
I strongly suspect the usage logs exist for individual cards, allowing to
back-trace the phonecalls done with the given card, thus tracing the
identity of the card's owner by the call patterns.
Of course.
How do you think they caught the Oklahoma
At 01:59 PM 3/26/04 -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 10:14 AM -0800 3/26/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
The point is that the asset (a performance) which the
bearer-document (ticket) grants access to expires. I think that's
actually orthogonal to the
ticket itself expiring.
Okay. The inverse,
R. A. Hettinga (2004-03-26 12:41Z) wrote:
At 7:20 AM + 3/26/04, Justin wrote:
Those nasty latin words are ceteris paribus.
Thank you.
On a network full of experts the price of error is bandwidth.
There's no reason to get all sarcastic.
For all I knew you could have unintentionally
Anonymizer is working with the FBI on international blackmail cases - no
subpoena required!
From http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/36485.html :
To download the online picture, he used the Anonymizer.com service,
believing the companys privacy policy would protect him. Not so. Dutch
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:32:43AM -0500, An Metet wrote:
From http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/36485.html :
To download the online picture, he used the Anonymizer.com service,
believing the companys privacy policy would protect him. Not so. Dutch
The article got it wrong. He used
Harmon Seaver wrote:
If a member of a club, to which you belong, commits an act of
violence, are you liable for that act?
No, but if the club, as an entity, does such, you should be. If
the corporation pollutes, all and sundry owners and employees should
be equally liable. Or maybe
On 26 Mar 2004, Frog wrote:
Harmon Seaver wrote:
If a voluntary association injures me,
Associations - corporate or otherwise - are abstract, intangible
entities. They don't perform actions. People do.
Corporations act as legal persons - they can enter into contracts, own
assetts,
What you are asking about (at Tort in any event) is the legal doctrine of
respondeat superior (let the master answer) making the master liable for
certain acts of the servant. An employer is therefore typically liable
for injury to person or property resulting from acts of an employee (See
At 12:17 PM -0600 3/26/04, Black Unicorn wrote:
respondeat superior
He's back.
Kewl...
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
... however it may
On Mar 26, 2004, at 9:13, petard wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:32:43AM -0500, An Metet wrote:
From http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/36485.html :
To download the online picture, he used the Anonymizer.com service,
believing the companys privacy policy would protect him. Not so. Dutch
At 08:16 AM 3/26/2004, Eric Tully wrote to the Cypherpunks list
From The Register:
To download the online picture, he used the anonymising Surfola service
(and not Anonymiser.com as we mistakenly wrote in our initial report -
apologies to all concerned - Ed), believing the company's
35 matches
Mail list logo
