There's laws against destroying evidence, interfering with an officer,
interfering with an investigation, etc. If they can prove that you had
it and destroyed it, now they can charge you with two crimes instead of
just one. (I think I heard once that someone was charged with
destroying evide
From The Register:
"To download the online picture, he used the anonymising Surfola service
(and not Anonymiser.com as we mistakenly wrote in our initial report -
apologies to all concerned - Ed), believing the company’s privacy policy
would protect him."
So now I don't know what to believ
e lack of cooperation among various entities."
AOL did not return calls seeking comment. An SBC spokesman said company
officials had fulfilled investigators' requests the same day they were
asked.
Once all the pieces were in place, though, White said, authorities
arrived at Krastof