I've been thinking about Carnivore for days. I can't really see the data
that it collects/spews forth being anywhere near uncontestable.
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Tim May wrote:
> At 5:48 PM -0500 11/28/00, David Honig wrote:
> >At 06:54 AM 11/28/00 -0500, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>Of course if they leav
Guess it's time for me to reminisce.. :)
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, sunder wrote:
> Back in those days, I remember having a shell account at school, and
> SLIP had just come out. Someone had written a small program that would
> allow users to run SLIP from userland and turn a dial-up shell into a
>
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Anonymous wrote:
> Each of us manages telephone book in some way. There is no need
> for central mapping of telephone numbers to persons.
>
> I mean *it works*.
On a small scale :)
> So I can set a small name-like server and me and my friends can install the
> said app, an
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, jon lebkowsky wrote:
> I'll say it again... I think the list should accept posts only from its
> members.
As others have said, and I'll say again: you're free to create your own
node - otherwise filter.
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Colin McDuff wrote:
> You dont know me but I got this e-mail address from a search on child porn!
> I don't know if you and your online "friends" where just descusing it or
> whether you use it.
> If you use it could you e-mail me back wit pics as proof and I will e-mail
>
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, petro wrote:
> >The Mac OS allows "groups" and suchlike privileges to be set, mainly
> >for networking. But the basic machine, and programs on it, have all
>
> IIRC, the current file system doesn't even have the concepts
> of permissions beyond the single user.
It do
