Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:31:39 -0700
From: cyphrpunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. Cash payments are final. After the fact, the paying party has no
means to reverse the payment. We call this property of cash
transactions _irreversibility_.
Certainly Chaum ecash has this property. Because
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:31:39 -0700
From: cyphrpunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. Cash payments are final. After the fact, the paying party has no
means to reverse the payment. We call this property of cash
transactions _irreversibility_.
Certainly Chaum ecash has this property. Because
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:42:47 -0400
From: Ian Grigg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems to me that the requirement for after-the-vote
verification (to prove your vote was counted) clashes
rather directly with the requirement to protect voters
from coercion (I can't prove I voted in a particular
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:42:47 -0400
From: Ian Grigg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems to me that the requirement for after-the-vote
verification (to prove your vote was counted) clashes
rather directly with the requirement to protect voters
from coercion (I can't prove I voted in a particular
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:42:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calling Lucky a liar is no more illuminating than others calling you
an idiot.
You're confusing a classification for an argument. The argument is over.
You can read it up in the archives. If you think
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 20:25:40 -0700
From: AARG!Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Right, as if my normal style has been so effective. Not one person has
given me the least support in my efforts to explain the truth about TCPA
and Palladium.
Hal, I think you were right on when you wrote:
But
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 19:30:09 -0700
From: AARG!Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re the debate over whether compilers reliably produce identical object
(executable) files:
The measurement and hashing in TCPA/Palladium will probably not be done
on the file itself, but on the executable content
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 20:25:40 -0700
From: AARG!Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Right, as if my normal style has been so effective. Not one person has
given me the least support in my efforts to explain the truth about TCPA
and Palladium.
Hal, I think you were right on when you wrote:
But
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 19:30:09 -0700
From: AARG!Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re the debate over whether compilers reliably produce identical object
(executable) files:
The measurement and hashing in TCPA/Palladium will probably not be done
on the file itself, but on the executable content
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 12:50:29 -0700
From: AARG!Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like the Palladium/TCPA critics to offer an alternative proposal
for achieving the following technical goal:
Allow computers separated on the internet to cooperate and share data
and computations such
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:55:40 +0200
From: R. Hirschfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 12:50:29 -0700
From: AARG!Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like the Palladium/TCPA critics to offer an alternative proposal
for achieving the following technical goal:
Allow
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 16:25:26 -0700
From: AARG!Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only way that TCPA will become as popular as you fear is if it really
solves problems for people. Otherwise nobody will pay the extra $25 to
put it in their machine.
Although I support the
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 12:50:29 -0700
From: AARG!Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like the Palladium/TCPA critics to offer an alternative proposal
for achieving the following technical goal:
Allow computers separated on the internet to cooperate and share data
and computations such
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:55:40 +0200
From: R. Hirschfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 12:50:29 -0700
From: AARG!Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like the Palladium/TCPA critics to offer an alternative proposal
for achieving the following technical goal:
Allow
From: James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:51:24 -0700
On 29 Jul 2002 at 15:35, AARG! Anonymous wrote:
both Palladium and TCPA deny that they are designed to restrict
what applications you run. The TPM FAQ at
15 matches
Mail list logo
