Re: A secure government

>>>The view I get fed all the time is that crypto is, on the whole, in >>>the hands of >>>the terrorists, the anti-patriots, the paedophiles, et al. >> >>Correct. >> >>>That it is a bad >>>thing. >> >>We don't think so. > > Mr Robinson: we understand the Bill of Rights applies to > some unsavory t

DoD offering admin privileges on .mil Web sites

Somewhere in amongst all the SQL warhol worm hype... "Care to register a .mil Web site of your own for free? The DoD has gone out of its way to make it a snap. An unbelievably badly-protected admin interface welcomes you to register whatever

Re: Forget VOA -- new exec order creating Global Communications Office

roflmfaoapimp. In a scarey kinda way. Thank Allah for indepent media... Declan McCullagh wrote: > New White House Office Coordinates Global Communications > > Why? I think we know why. If the messenger brig s amessage people don't like and then they shoot the messenger and eat the m

Re: Petro's catch-22 incorrect (Re: citizens can be named as enemy combatants)

Tyler Durden wrote: > John Keley wrote... > > "Osama Bin Laden might not hate us, but *someone* would." > > Well, perhaps we fucked with the wrong guy. "Fucked with". "Trained up and fucked over". Whatever. > BTW...a Muslim co-worker sardonically stated recently that our new war > with Iraq is

Re: Vampires, GM Food and Malawi

Andri Isidoro Fernandes Esteves wrote: > -- > Malawian vampires now using sleeping gas > > New York Times > > "Malawi, despite the best efforts of its government, is in the grip of a > form of hysteria. Vampires are attacking the villag

Re: Desert Spam

Major Variola (ret) wrote: > At 03:44 PM 1/16/03 +0100, Anonymous wrote: > >> Does anyone know a source for a spam list for US military? > > Use google. Search for @*.mil Also large bureaucracies use > standard forms like First.Surname@blah or FSurname@blah Not forgetting Google's Uncle Sam se