A radio report claimed that anew 'feature' of the cards was replacement of lost or
stolen cards. That sounds like there is a plan to tie cards to individuals.
j
<- Original Text ->
What's to link? All that can be linked is that a metrocard was bought
in one place, be it a subway station,
Actually shooting 150 visitors would be hell on business. Damn, your pesky tenants
will probably object strenuously if you simply shooed 150 potential (opinionated)
customers.
Stalin & the Chinese tried the shooting route, the fallout wasn't cool.
Fortunately the market apparently has responses
Some years ago my brother-in-law tried to take advantage of benefits because of his
surname 'Diaz' (he was half Mexican).
That didn't fly because he apparently was just too 'American' (native English speaker,
etc).
jay
On 21 Feb 2003 at 16:55, Bill Stewart wrote:
>
> A number of years ago, a
On 16 Feb 2003 at 18:30, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Yes they are. By definition, intimidation and violence by
> governments is not terrorism. The fact that the recipient is
> feeling "terror" is irrelevant. Take back the language.
>
> >
Actually that is the original, 'terrorism' as both word and con
Apparently artwork depicting the horror war is just to disconcerting a backdrop for
Ambassador Negroponte as he rallies the troops.
http://www.artdaily.com/noticiaframe.asp?not=11&fnot=2/2/2003
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/9820/guernica.htm (the painting in question)
We don't want war
Now the significance of the Ministry of Silly Walks becomes clear...
On 8 Jan 2003 at 16:01, Michael Motyka wrote:
> MV wrote :
> > At 11:34 PM 1/8/03 +0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> > > I don't know the weaknesses of gait-observing systems, so I can't
> > > suggest
> > > anything.
> > >
> >
Porn is one of the best places to steganographically hide info. Since many people keep
their porn out of sight, and keep large numbers of photos on the drive, it doesn't
look particularly suspicious to have a stash lying about, or to exchange with others.
j
While this clarification may be true, the government should realize that the
unconstitutional 'deep secret' library searches of the PATRIOT act render such rumors
as credible, causing their actions to be treated with deep suspicion even when the
actions may be legitimate. [We saw this in the UFO
The problem might be the resultant emf signature, much more of a giveaway than the
brief activity of a digital camera.
What really might be useful is steganographically placing it on the back of some
bulshit cellphone call (not likely to arouse much suspicion these days)
j
<- Original Text
Previous message got lost in the ether (I think).
Does anyone know what happened to this site? After all the buildup
it seem unaccessiblej
j
On 15 Jul 2002 at 16:36, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/internet/07/15/censorship.reut/index.html
>
>
> --
> ___
Does any one know what happened the the hactivisimo website?
It was cited even on CNN, now it seems unavailable.
j
On 15 Jul 2002 at 16:36, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/internet/07/15/censorship.reut/index.html
>
>
> --
> __
My comment was basically a musing, but nonetheless technically since it is a crime
to reveal that the feds have gotten information, it would seem that declaring that
they
have not provided information is in itself a declaration about fed activity and so
covered.
You are right, that librarians
An interesting point and a serious threat to privacy. Alas I would like to see a more
reliable source forthcoming than Worldnetdaily.
j
On 11 Jun 2002 at 17:44, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> http://theregister.co.uk/content/54/25674.html
>
>
> --
> ___
13 matches
Mail list logo
