> Let me get this straight. You've got better things to do than
> catch up on basic topics that have been hashed to death and are
> very well expressed every two months in the archives, yet we don't
> have anything better to do than personally address your laziness?
> Am I correctly summarizing y
> >I'll say it again... I think the list should accept posts only from its
> >members.
>
> No.
>
> If you lack the skill or will to setup your own filtering go somewhere
else.
It's not a matter of "skill or will" - it's famously difficult to filter
spam effectively, as you should know if you've b
> All of these options suck.
Yeah, and so does a list that's heavily spammed. But whatever. I know how to
deal with spam, I was thinking more of the character of the list.
> Ok, either go read the last two years of traffic on this topic or get a
> clue (assuming your head doesn't explode as a result).
>
> We are NOT moderating the list. We are NOT closing the list to non-member
> submissions.
For the benefit of those of us who might have better things to do than wa
I'll say it again... I think the list should accept posts only from its
members.
- Original Message -
X-Loop: openpgp.net
From: "Kurth Bemis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2000 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: Spam?
> At 12:31 PM
Interesting spoof. Is this supposed to get cypherpunks pissed off because
they think they've rec'd spam from Al Gore?
> -Original Message-
> From: Gore Mail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 11:08 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Running Mate
>
