Re: Fwd: [IP] Gilmore bounced from plane; and Farber censors Gilmore's email

2003-07-23 Thread Steve Schear
At 09:18 2003-07-23 -0400, "Tyler Durden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "I mean, a 1 inch button, for Christ's sake. They must have had to use a magnifying glass to read the slogan." Actually, that's an interesting point. Let's first of all remember that Gilmore was allowed onto the plane in the fir

Re: [IP] Gilmore bounced from plane; and Farber censors Gilmore's email

2003-07-23 Thread Freematt357
In a message dated 7/23/2003 9:23:58 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, that's an interesting point. Let's first of all remember that Gilmore was allowed onto the plane in the first place, so airport security didn't care or notice.   You are correct, and this means

Re: Fwd: [IP] Gilmore bounced from plane; and Farber censors Gilmore's email

2003-07-22 Thread Dave Howe
John Kozubik wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Major Variola (ret) wrote: > >>> Where do these ridiculous ideas come from ? If I own a piece of >>> private property, like an airplane (or an entire airline) for >>> instance, I can impose whatever senseless and arbitrary conditions >>> on your use of it

Re: Fwd: [IP] Gilmore bounced from plane; and Farber censors Gilmore's email

2003-07-21 Thread John Kozubik
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Major Variola (ret) wrote: > >Where do these ridiculous ideas come from ? If I own a piece of > private > >property, like an airplane (or an entire airline) for instance, I can > >impose whatever senseless and arbitrary conditions on your use of it as > I > >please. > > Yes.

Re: Fwd: [IP] Gilmore bounced from plane; and Farber censors Gilmore's email

2003-07-21 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 11:36 PM 7/20/03 -0700, John Kozubik wrote: >On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Steve Schear wrote: > >> >remove a small 1" button pinned to my left lapel. I declined, saying >> >that it was a political statement and that he had no right to censor >> >passengers' political speech. The button, which was cre

Re: [IP] Gilmore bounced from plane; and Farber censors Gilmore's email

2003-07-21 Thread Freematt357
In a message dated 7/21/2003 2:56:45 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It is difficult to imagine how "blah blah employee number four Sun Microsystems blah blah" is capable of this kind of cognitive dissonance. (John) helped to build and launch one of the most exciting and inn

Re: Fwd: [IP] Gilmore bounced from plane; and Farber censors Gilmore's email

2003-07-20 Thread John Kozubik
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Steve Schear wrote: > >remove a small 1" button pinned to my left lapel. I declined, saying > >that it was a political statement and that he had no right to censor > >passengers' political speech. The button, which was created by Where do these ridiculous ideas come from ?

Re: [Dewayne-Net] RE: [IP] Gilmore bounced from plane; and Farber censors Gilmore's email

2003-07-20 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 09:16 AM 7/20/03 -0700, Steve Schear wrote: >>>Guess he's never heard of US court's limitations against using 'free >>>speech' as a defense against the consequences of falsely yelling 'Fire' >>>in a crowded theater. > >Except when there really is a fire, which is certainly the case here. > >stev

Re: [Dewayne-Net] RE: [IP] Gilmore bounced from plane; and Farber censors Gilmore's email

2003-07-20 Thread Steve Schear
At 11:08 2003-07-19 -0700, you wrote: [Note: This comment comes from reader Dave Hughes. DLH] At 10:16 -0700 7/19/03, Dave Hughes wrote: From: "Dave Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [Dewayne-Net] [IP] Gilmore bounced from plane; and Far