At 10:07 AM 1/14/05 -0500, Trei, Peter wrote:
>It would take some chutzpa, but tacking onto a cops
>car would send a message
Too easy.
5 points for adding to cop's personal car
10 points for adding to cop's spouse's personal car
20 points for adding to cop's mistress' personal car
Not sure ab
Bill Stewart wrote:
> At 12:30 PM 1/12/2005, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
> >Just out of curiosity, if the man doesn't need a warrent
> >to place a surveilance device, shouldn't it be within your rights
> >to tamper with, disable or remove such a device if you discover one?
>
> Do you mean that if yo
At 12:30 PM 1/12/2005, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
Just out of curiosity, if the man doesn't need a warrent
to place a surveilance device, shouldn't it be within your rights
to tamper with, disable or remove such a device if you discover one?
Do you mean that if you discover an unsolicited gift of
con
Re: the embedded item:
http://timesunion.com/AspStories/storyprint.asp?StoryID=322152
Ruling gives cops leeway with GPS
Decision allows use of vehicle tracking device without a warrant
By BRENDAN LYONS, Staff writer
First published: Tuesday, January 11, 2005
In a decision that could dramatically af
- Forwarded message from David Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: David Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:46:47 -0500
To: Ip
Subject: [IP] No expectation of privacy in public? In a
pig's eye!
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or
