At 06:45 PM 12/3/2002 -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
I suppose that if it's not blinded, or at least functionally anonymous,
like you'd get with statistically-tested streaming cash, it's not *that*
bearer, but, hey, that's just *my* opinion, right?
Since it has no payee or associated holder information and can "circulate"
via re-issuance (even if there is a charge) it has bearer "characteristics".
I would assume that anything that has accounts with client names on them is
probably not bearer, either, though Mark Twain did something quite like
that.
DMT accounts have no customer information associated.
steve
