ANWR

2001-09-24 Thread Jim Choate
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NB : I'm not opposed to drilling Alaskan oil - after Kuwait runs dry... I am. Find another way other than killing the Polar Bears (they have to helicopter them around the N. pole each year so they don't starve), seals, whales, etc. Your right to

ANWR

2001-09-24 Thread mmotyka
and cronies want to do in ANWR is entirely unrelated to strategy - they want the right to go make money by drilling on public lands. If it goes through in the near future watch how much the government spends on roads and other support to get the drillers in there and how much is payed in return by the oil

Re: ANWR

2001-09-24 Thread mmotyka
: At 02:43 PM 9/24/2001 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What Bush and cronies want to do in ANWR is entirely unrelated to strategy - they want the right to go make money by drilling on public lands. If it goes through in the near future watch how much the government spends on roads and other support

Re: ANWR

2001-09-24 Thread Steve Schear
At 02:43 PM 9/24/2001 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What Bush and cronies want to do in ANWR is entirely unrelated to strategy - they want the right to go make money by drilling on public lands. If it goes through in the near future watch how much the government spends on roads and other

Re: CDR: ANWR

2001-09-24 Thread mmotyka
), seals, whales, etc. Your right to TRY to make money doesn't over-ride my right to a reasonably maintaned planet. As usual you misunderstand me - I only approve of going into ANWR in a case of dire need. Our society depends so heavily on fossil fuels that a sudden removal would cause panic

Re: ANWR

2001-09-24 Thread David Honig
At 04:23 PM 9/24/01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also think we should learn a lesson from NY - annual vehicle registration costs are based on vehicle weight. Mike That's not fair. It penalizes safer (more massive) cars without regard to their actual petrol consumption. If you only tax

Re: CDR: ANWR

2001-09-24 Thread Jim Choate
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As usual you misunderstand me - I only approve of going into ANWR in a case of dire need. Our society depends so heavily on fossil fuels that a sudden removal would cause panic and starvation. I don't misunderstand at all. Better we learn to live