Phillip H. Zakas[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:29 AM
> To: Tim May; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Attention to detail lacking
>
> Tim May Wrote:
>
> > I think Choate is much like this tech of mine: lacking a solid
> &g
Tim,
>>I think the reflected beam has the same wavelength as the incident beam.
>
>Photons hitting a surface most definitely do not "lose some energy"
>and get "re-emitted." There are some very particular configurations
>that can act as wavelength doublers, but this is a particular, and
>hard
At 10:29 AM -0400 7/25/01, Phillip H. Zakas wrote:
>Tim May Wrote:
>
>> I think Choate is much like this tech of mine: lacking a solid
>> grounding and overly reliant on his own private notions of what
>> "mass" and "energy" and "group velocity" and so on are. All the best
>> cranks view the w
Tim May Wrote:
> I think Choate is much like this tech of mine: lacking a solid
> grounding and overly reliant on his own private notions of what
> "mass" and "energy" and "group velocity" and so on are. All the best
> cranks view the world this way.
maybe Choate is the long lost son of oedip
Jim,
I think you often don't word things carefully enough. The resulting
discussions get pointless in a big hurry.
>>>
>>>The optics used for focusing are NOT mirrors, they are (hopefully)
>>>transparent at the frequency under use. A mirror on the other hand is
>>>required to be OPAQUE with resp
At 8:35 PM -0700 7/24/01, Tim May wrote:
>At 8:24 PM -0700 7/24/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I think Choate is much like this tech of mine:
Have you ever seen the two of them together?
>
>(Not that college physics is needed.
I should hope not, I've got a Fine Art degree with
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You stated that every photon interacts, loses energy and is re-emitted.
Sure, it has it's momentum changed. Think about it. The photon comes in
from one direction and is absorbed/interacts with the atoms. As a result
they get re-emitted (reflected
