Re: CDR Anonymizer (fwd)

2001-10-03 Thread Jim Choate
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote: > I'm getting mail w/o a "To" line of: > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think that is remailer software dependent. I can say that the SSZ CDR doesn't over-write the To: field on resend. lne apparently does. Might talk to the list op and see if they hav

Re: CDR Anonymizer (fwd)

2001-10-03 Thread Eric Murray
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 02:35:25PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > I'm getting mail w/o a "To" line of: > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I'm looking for an effective procmail filtering rule. As I'm subscribed > to LNE, I'm currently filtering on: > > :0: > * ^Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CDR Anonymizer (fwd)

2001-10-03 Thread CDR Anonymizer
I received the following ... -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 09:54:32 -0700 Subject: CDR Anonymizer Hi Jim. Could you hack your CDR Anonymizer script to pass the To: and Cc: lines? Every time someone uses it, I get a bounce from a couple lne CDR subscribers whos M