:-)
At 08:48 PM 10/01/2001 -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote:
- Forwarded message from Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FC: Congress drafts new anti-terror bill -- with expiration date
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 20:32:57
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bill Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's nice that the proposal has a sunset clause in it,
to limit the amount of time that we're subject to the
various good or bad half-baked suggestions and the various
agencies' requests for powers they've always wanted.
Expect
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:09:50PM -0700, Bill Stewart wrote:
It's nice that the proposal has a sunset clause in it,
to limit the amount of time that we're subject to the
various good or bad half-baked suggestions and the various
agencies' requests for powers they've always wanted.
Expect
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:49:34PM +, Ian Goldberg wrote:
Note that (if I'm reading it right) the sunset only applies to Title I
(the Internet surveillance bits), and not, for example, to the hacking
is terrorism bits in Title III (section 309). The sunset also applies
Ian: I think
There are numerous changes in PATRIOT from MATA and ATA,
and it has over twice their length. It still uses the same
obfuscation style of burying dozens of proposals as modifications
of existing legislation, making it hard to understand what is
being proposed without jigsaw puzzling the pieces
John Young wrote:
USA. USA.
Remember, do not say out loud, fuck that. Think abou it,
then decide to self-suppress for a couple of years, then
a couple more, then more after that. It's a long, long campaign
the leaders warn, just like their predecessors said the main
enemy is within.
