At 02:09 PM 11/10/2003 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
"I think that's the source as well - when the most recent of the
TWINKLE and TWIRL papers came out, Lucky Green was talking about
whether it was still safe to use 1024-bit keys,
and $1B for 1 key/day is similar to Shamir & Tromer's estimate of
At 02:09 PM 11/10/03 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
>My first question is, how easy is it for them to estimate the key size
of an
>encrypted message?
Its not secret. But lets look at twiddling what the message header
encodes.
Suppose you relabel a 2Kbit key as a 1Kbit. Then what are the extra
bits
"I think that's the source as well - when the most recent of the
TWINKLE and TWIRL papers came out, Lucky Green was talking about
whether it was still safe to use 1024-bit keys,
and $1B for 1 key/day is similar to Shamir & Tromer's estimate of
( http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~tromer/p
