--- Jonathan Wienke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I get the NRA's American Rifleman magazine. The July
> issue also has
> an article about Ashcroft's letter, which does not
> quote the rather
> lengthy footnote. However, it does contain a legible
> image of BOTH
> pages of the letter, including
Title: RE: General Ashcroft make his move
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I get the NRA's American Rifleman magazine. The July issue also has
an article about Ashcroft's letter, which does not quote the rather
lengthy footnote. However, it does contain a legible ima
At 7:55 PM -1000 7/12/01, Reese wrote:
>This makes it likely for Ashcrap's justice department to drop the case,
>which means a clear 2nd Amendment issue will not go to the SCoTUS, which
>means as soon as this case is out of the pipeline, they can "change"
>their policy just like they just did. Es
Matt,
Thanks for posting this. I'm not sure why this should be a surprise.
Groups that care about currying favor with Congress and the
administration have a strong incentive to distort the truth to
constitutents in hopes of persuading them that awful compromises are
not.
To use examples from the
At 06:09 PM 7/12/01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>What is your position on the First Amendment and:
>
>o "obscenity"
>
>o child pornography
>
>o generated non-child child pornography
And synthetic images depicting *cloned* children...
ECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 12:01 PM
Subject: CDR: Re: General Ashcroft make his move
> [Note from Matthew Gaylor: Richard Stevens is author of the recent
> book "Dial 911 and Die" published by the Jews for the Preservation of
> Firearms Owne
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jimminy Critic wrote:
> #
> #Now a couple of questions for you...
>
> Yabut you gave cryptic replies, like
> answering a question with a question.
Some answers are question, even if one doesn't recognize, like, or want to
accept it.
> #W
Jimminy Critic wrote:
#
#Now a couple of questions for you...
Yabut you gave cryptic replies, like
answering a question with a question.
#Where in the Constitution does it say the fed's are supposed
#to regulate pornography or sex?
Interstate commerce?
#Where in the Constituti
Jimminy Critic wrote:
#
#Where is that boundary condition in the amendment? Saying "felons
#may not own firearms" is certainly an infringment. Rights don't
#come from the state after all (see 1st two para's of the DoI).
#
#Amendment II
#
#A well regulated Militia, being neces
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gee, how pure and simple.
Well see...
> What is your position on the First Amendment and:
>
> o "obscenity"
What is 'obscene'?
> o child pornography
What is 'pornography'?
As to the 'child' part of that, any interaction with a minor i
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Matthew Gaylor wrote:
> As you know, Ashcroft also said in that footnote in
> his letter that the Constitution "does not prohibit
> Congress from enacting laws restricting firearms
> ownership for compelling state interests, such as
> prohibiting firearms ownership by convic
[Note from Matthew Gaylor: Richard Stevens is author of the recent
book "Dial 911 and Die" published by the Jews for the Preservation of
Firearms Ownership. http://www.jpfo.org ]
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 16:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Richard Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Matt -- we must pro
General Ashcroft has announce the Second Amendment
applies to individuals.
This will apparently affect the case of a Tim Emerson,
a Texas physician accused of violating a 1994 law
barring people under restraining orders from having
guns. The DOJ is currently appealing the case claiming
the Second
13 matches
Mail list logo
