At 06:50 AM 3/2/2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
"How about a pseudo random "conversation" generator appliance for the
person trying to mask their speech. If it closely models the vocal tract,
language and language characteristics of the speaker it might be extremely
difficult to remove as backgroun
Now, they have to send a truck'
-TD
From: Steve Schear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: sunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:11:42 -0800
At 07:42 AM 3/1/2004, sunder wrote:
Interesting.
I guess
Justin says:
> If they know you're trying to shake them, that alerts them and
> eliminates any opportunity you might have otherwise had to feed them
> misinformation in the future.
That's when you strap on the C-4 vest.
Zombie Monger
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 10:42, sunder wrote:
> For example, one way to piss them off is to attempt to sing when you have
> zero singing skills, and do it for hours on end, purposely off key, abusing
> whatever instrument is available...
Ugh. I did _not_ want to think about Kofi Annan yodeling for
Major Variola (ret) (2004-03-01 18:01Z) wrote:
> In order to avoid places with ears (and "homeless" people with
> directional mics, see _Enemy of the State_) go to a park that you
> haven't been to before. And perform the usual CI driving maneuvres
> (see that Tomlinson book _The Big Breach_ for
TED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:09:09 -0500
At 10:01 AM -0800 3/1/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>(What was that Brit town sacrificed so the Germans wouldn't know
>the codes were b
At 10:01 AM -0800 3/1/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>(What was that Brit town sacrificed so the Germans wouldn't know
>the codes were broken? Starts with "C"...)
Coventry...
Ancient cathedral, etc...
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporatio
At 09:46 AM 3/1/04 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
>I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter-surveillance
>actions that can be taken that, while not ensuring secure
communications,
>forces eavesdropping parties to take 'radical' measures in order to
obtain
>the desired information?
S
Tyler Durden wrote:
Interesting.
I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter-surveillance
actions that can be taken that, while not ensuring secure
communications, forces eavesdropping parties to take 'radical' measures
in order to obtain the desired information? In other words,
D]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Gentlemen reading mail part II
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:19:13 -0800
Blix says US spied on him over Iraq
Reuters London Feb 28: Former chief United Nations weapons inspector Mr
Hans Blix said today
Steve Furlong wrote:
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 17:19, Major Variola (ret.) forwarded:
Blix says US spied on him over Iraq
...
It feels like an intrusion into
your integrity in a situation when you are actually on the same side.
Begging the question of whether Blix was actually on the same side as
At 09:16 PM 2/29/04 -0500, Steve Furlong wrote:
>On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 17:19, Major Variola (ret.) forwarded:
>> Blix says US spied on him over Iraq
>> ...
>> It feels like an intrusion into
>> your integrity in a situation when you are actually on the same
side.
>
>Begging the question of whethe
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 17:19, Major Variola (ret.) forwarded:
> Blix says US spied on him over Iraq
> ...
> It feels like an intrusion into
> your integrity in a situation when you are actually on the same side.
Begging the question of whether Blix was actually on the same side as
the Brits or th
Blix says US spied on him over Iraq
Reuters London Feb 28: Former chief United Nations weapons inspector Mr
Hans Blix said today he suspected the United States bugged his office
and home in the run-up to the Iraq war, but had no hard evidence.
Describing such behaviour as disgusting, Mr Blix to
14 matches
Mail list logo