Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II

2004-03-02 Thread Steve Schear
At 06:50 AM 3/2/2004, Tyler Durden wrote: "How about a pseudo random "conversation" generator appliance for the person trying to mask their speech. If it closely models the vocal tract, language and language characteristics of the speaker it might be extremely difficult to remove as backgroun

Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II

2004-03-02 Thread Tyler Durden
Now, they have to send a truck' -TD From: Steve Schear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: sunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:11:42 -0800 At 07:42 AM 3/1/2004, sunder wrote: Interesting. I guess

Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)

2004-03-01 Thread Nomen Nescio
Justin says: > If they know you're trying to shake them, that alerts them and > eliminates any opportunity you might have otherwise had to feed them > misinformation in the future. That's when you strap on the C-4 vest. Zombie Monger

Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II

2004-03-01 Thread Steve Furlong
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 10:42, sunder wrote: > For example, one way to piss them off is to attempt to sing when you have > zero singing skills, and do it for hours on end, purposely off key, abusing > whatever instrument is available... Ugh. I did _not_ want to think about Kofi Annan yodeling for

Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)

2004-03-01 Thread Justin
Major Variola (ret) (2004-03-01 18:01Z) wrote: > In order to avoid places with ears (and "homeless" people with > directional mics, see _Enemy of the State_) go to a park that you > haven't been to before. And perform the usual CI driving maneuvres > (see that Tomlinson book _The Big Breach_ for

Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)

2004-03-01 Thread Tyler Durden
TED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:09:09 -0500 At 10:01 AM -0800 3/1/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote: >(What was that Brit town sacrificed so the Germans wouldn't know >the codes were b

Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)

2004-03-01 Thread R. A. Hettinga
At 10:01 AM -0800 3/1/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote: >(What was that Brit town sacrificed so the Germans wouldn't know >the codes were broken? Starts with "C"...) Coventry... Ancient cathedral, etc... Cheers, RAH -- - R. A. Hettinga The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporatio

Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)

2004-03-01 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 09:46 AM 3/1/04 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote: >I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter-surveillance >actions that can be taken that, while not ensuring secure communications, >forces eavesdropping parties to take 'radical' measures in order to obtain >the desired information? S

Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II

2004-03-01 Thread sunder
Tyler Durden wrote: Interesting. I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter-surveillance actions that can be taken that, while not ensuring secure communications, forces eavesdropping parties to take 'radical' measures in order to obtain the desired information? In other words,

RE: Gentlemen reading mail part II

2004-03-01 Thread Tyler Durden
D]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Gentlemen reading mail part II Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:19:13 -0800 Blix says US spied on him over Iraq Reuters London Feb 28: Former chief United Nations weapons inspector Mr Hans Blix said today

Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II

2004-03-01 Thread sunder
Steve Furlong wrote: On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 17:19, Major Variola (ret.) forwarded: Blix says US spied on him over Iraq ... It feels like an intrusion into your integrity in a situation when you are actually on the same side. Begging the question of whether Blix was actually on the same side as

Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II

2004-02-29 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 09:16 PM 2/29/04 -0500, Steve Furlong wrote: >On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 17:19, Major Variola (ret.) forwarded: >> Blix says US spied on him over Iraq >> ... >> It feels like an intrusion into >> your integrity in a situation when you are actually on the same side. > >Begging the question of whethe

Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II

2004-02-29 Thread Steve Furlong
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 17:19, Major Variola (ret.) forwarded: > Blix says US spied on him over Iraq > ... > It feels like an intrusion into > your integrity in a situation when you are actually on the same side. Begging the question of whether Blix was actually on the same side as the Brits or th

Gentlemen reading mail part II

2004-02-29 Thread Major Variola (ret.)
Blix says US spied on him over Iraq Reuters London Feb 28: Former chief United Nations weapons inspector Mr Hans Blix said today he suspected the United States bugged his office and home in the run-up to the Iraq war, but had no hard evidence. Describing such behaviour as “disgusting”, Mr Blix to