At 09:46 AM 3/1/04 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
>I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter-surveillance
>actions that can be taken that, while not ensuring secure
communications,
>forces eavesdropping parties to take 'radical' measures in order to
obtain
>the desired information?
S
At 10:01 AM -0800 3/1/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>(What was that Brit town sacrificed so the Germans wouldn't know
>the codes were broken? Starts with "C"...)
Coventry...
Ancient cathedral, etc...
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporatio
TED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II (opsec review)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:09:09 -0500
At 10:01 AM -0800 3/1/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>(What was that Brit town sacrificed so the Germans wouldn't know
>the codes were b
Major Variola (ret) (2004-03-01 18:01Z) wrote:
> In order to avoid places with ears (and "homeless" people with
> directional mics, see _Enemy of the State_) go to a park that you
> haven't been to before. And perform the usual CI driving maneuvres
> (see that Tomlinson book _The Big Breach_ for
Justin says:
> If they know you're trying to shake them, that alerts them and
> eliminates any opportunity you might have otherwise had to feed them
> misinformation in the future.
That's when you strap on the C-4 vest.
Zombie Monger
