Re: Google Exposes Web Surveillance Cams

2005-01-12 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 02:20 PM 1/9/05 -0600, Riad S. Wahby wrote: >I love how all of the coverage leaves out the actual search strings, as >if it's hard to discover what they are at this point. I'm similarly annoyed that articles omit the URLs of "terrorist web sites", being forced to check ogrish.com, even if I c

Re: Google Exposes Web Surveillance Cams

2005-01-11 Thread Anton Raath
Riad S. Wahby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I love how all of the coverage leaves out the actual search strings, as > if it's hard to discover what they are at this point. A fairly comprehensive list of search strings per camera/manufacturer can be found here: http://www.i-hacked.com/Computer-Com

Re: Google Exposes Web Surveillance Cams

2005-01-09 Thread Riad S. Wahby
Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >with the discovery that a pair of simple Google searches permits I love how all of the coverage leaves out the actual search strings, as if it's hard to discover what they are at this point. http://www.google.com/search?q=inurl%3A%22ViewerFrame%3FMode%3

Google Exposes Web Surveillance Cams

2005-01-09 Thread Eugen Leitl
Link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/09/1411242 Posted by: CmdrTaco, on 2005-01-09 15:00:00 from the pick-a-password-people dept. An anonymous reader writes "Blogs and message forums buzzed this week with the discovery that a pair of simple Google searches permits [1]access