> However, it should be known that fiberglass (eg van) panels are
> transparent
> to uwaves AFAIK and that a van with soft tires is a 0th-order
0.25" glass will cost you 2-2.5 dB.
> At sufficiently good mechanical stabilization and gain, you will
> encounter perhaps
The best way to do this is to
At 06:03 PM 6/16/04 +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>Aperture is tiny (and expensive, exponentially so). Visible wavelength
vs.
>microwave is a
>complete overkill in terms of mirror precision (lambda/10..100).
Exactly. I wasn't suggesting using the optical reflector (front surface
Al over glass)
but ra
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:50:34AM -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
> Do optical mirrors still work in the microwave regime? I have no idea.
Aperture is tiny (and expensive, exponentially so). Visible wavelength vs. microwave
is a
complete overkill in terms of mirror precision (lambda/10..100).
Depend
Do optical mirrors still work in the microwave regime? I have no idea.
-TD
From: "Major Variola (ret)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Low-elevation skymapping at 2.45 Ghz
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:09:26 -0700
Telescopes a
