Re: [FoRK] X.509 certificate collision via MD5 collisions (fwd from jeff@k2.com)

's techniques will be revealed this May at Eurocrypt. I'm looking forward to finding out what the secret is! Presumably everyone will receive MD5 collision finding software at around that time. The cert collision is not a surprise, people anticipated this possibility shortly after the M

[FoRK] X.509 certificate collision via MD5 collisions (fwd from jeff@k2.com)

- Forwarded message from Jeffrey Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Jeffrey Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:02:42 -0500 To: FoRK Discussion Subject: [FoRK] X.509 certificate collision via MD5 collisions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) This is a pretty inter

Re: MD5 collisions?

--- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:11:22 +1000 To: Mads Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Greg Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: MD5 collisions? Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 14:12 2004-08-17 -0300, Mads Ras

Re: MD5 collisions?

At 10:03 PM -0500 8/17/04, Declan McCullagh wrote: >Sigh. RAH has descended to the level of a net.kook. > >Never would have guessed. You've exactly the same used the same rhetorical device twice now. Are you just lazy, or, more likely, have you just peaked too soon? How does it feel to be someon

"Owning" Ones Own Words, Peaking Too Soon, The Cypherpunk Purity Test, and Bora-Bora (Re: MD5 collisions?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 1:40 AM -0400 8/18/04, Declan McCullagh trots out the Cypherpunk Purity Test, among other tasty bits of speciousness: >At 01:02 AM 8/18/2004, J.A. Terranson wrote: >>Since when is on-topic crossposting an issue here? > >Since forever. To elucidat

Re: MD5 collisions?

At 01:02 AM 8/18/2004, J.A. Terranson wrote: Since when is on-topic crossposting an issue here? Since forever. Since before either of us joined the list (and I first started reading a decade ago). It's a matter of politeness and degree. A pointer to a discussion archived on the web is more usefu

Re: MD5 collisions?

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Declan McCullagh wrote: > Sigh. RAH has descended to the level of a net.kook. > > Never would have guessed. > > -Declan Since when is on-topic crossposting an issue here? -- Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0xBD4A95BF "...justice is a duty towards those whom you

Re: MD5 collisions?

At 09:04 PM 8/17/04 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote: >At 7:33 PM -0500 8/17/04, Declan McCullagh wrote: >>One is enough. Less is more. Let's eliminate redundancy, thus eliminating >>redundancy. LMAO RAH :-) = 36 Laurelwood Dr Irvine CA 92620-1299 VOX

Re: MD5 collisions?

Sigh. RAH has descended to the level of a net.kook. Never would have guessed. -Declan

Re: MD5 collisions?

At 8:58 PM -0500 8/17/04, Declan McCullagh wrote: >I hadn't noticed. How uncharacteristic of him. Never would have guessed. ...and my mother dresses me funny? You can do better than that, Declan -- if you do say so yourself. Self-important git. -RAH -- - R. A. Hettinga The

Re: MD5 collisions?

Oh, so it was RAH who was responsible for the repeated random useless forwards? I hadn't noticed. How uncharacteristic of him. Never would have guessed. -Declan On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 09:06:20PM -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote: > At 7:33 PM -0500 8/17/04, Declan McCullagh wrote: > >One is enough.

Re: MD5 collisions?

...and another thing... At 7:33 PM -0500 8/17/04, Declan McCullagh wrote: >-Declan "TCM" McCullagh Does this mean you spend all day in a Barcolounger dry-jacking a Mossberg, muttering about Janet Reno? ;-) Cheers, RAH "Banks in Hong Kong and Shanghai", indeed... -- - R. A. He

Re: MD5 collisions?

At 7:33 PM -0500 8/17/04, Declan McCullagh wrote: >One is enough. Less is more. Let's eliminate redundancy, thus eliminating >redundancy. Yawn. "Let's" piss up a rope, shall we? Cheers, RAH -- - R. A. Hettinga The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation

Re: MD5 collisions?

At 7:33 PM -0500 8/17/04, Declan McCullagh wrote: >One is enough. Less is more. Let's eliminate redundancy, thus eliminating >redundancy. -- - R. A. Hettinga The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however

Re: MD5 collisions?

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:10:58 -0400 > From: Thomas Harold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) > Gecko/20040616 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MD5 collisions? > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: MD5 collisions?

--- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:10:58 -0400 From: Thomas Harold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MD5 collisions? Sender: [EMAIL PRO