-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Eric Cordian
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 6:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Moral Crypto isn't wuss-ninnie.
Aimee writes:
I realize Tim's position, and I respect his right
Aimee writes:
I realize Tim's position, and I respect his right to express his political
opinions and ideas, even though I don't agree with them, and think he is a
self-identifying flamboyant jackass. I understand that many of you have the
same opinions, and likewise
Guess not all Lying
On Tuesday, September 4, 2001, at 05:26 PM, Aimee Farr wrote:
A potential balance between national security and science may lie in an
agreement to include in the peer review process (prior to the start of
research and prior to the publication) the question of potential harm
to the
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Aimee Farr wrote:
It is not wuss-ninnie to spark debate, or to examine characterizations and
motives. Many say, technology is neutral. It's not. Technology is
CONTEXTUAL.
Ah, another convert. See, The message is the medium isn't right after
all...it takes message,
A potential balance between national security and science may lie in an
agreement to include in the peer review process (prior to the start of
research and prior to the publication) the question of potential harm to the
nation I believe it is necessary before significant harm does occur
which
