On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
>
> > Maybe, maybe not. I'm the first to agree that porn *should* be treated as
> > equal to other speech,
>
> But 'porn' is no more speech than 'murder' is. What makes porn so
> offensive isn't the pictures,
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 01:53:58PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
> > Third, the issue of online porn, the CDA, the Amateur Action case, etc.
> > have been discussed many times here.
>
> The NRC study will be very important in Washington DC circles (less
>
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Tim May wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 14, 2001, at 01:22 PM, James B. DiGriz wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, James B. DiGriz wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> And so I've said my say,
> >> jbdigriz
> >>
> >
> > Uh, ya'll don't all respond at once now.
> >
> > Seriously, I know I'm not a
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, James B. DiGriz wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>
> > - Forwarded message from Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> >
> > From: Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: FC: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet porn repor
