At 07:20 PM 4/11/04 +, Justin wrote:
>Major Variola (ret) (2004-04-11 16:42Z) wrote:
>
>> Blacknet is a robust archive for words, immune to force
>> (by State or private actors), but merely words.
>
>With all due respect to the principle of freedom of speech and all
that,
>I think that cypherpu
At 05:38 AM 4/11/04 -0400, An Metet wrote:
>> And the responsibles need killing.
>
>No, they don't.
>
>There are two alternative solutions to the problem of restrictions on
>information flow, or more generally restrictions on any sort of
voluntary
>and cooperative activity. One is to use force to
An Metet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This stuff should be Cypherpunks 101.
...along with Assassination Politics. I've always taken "X needs
killing" to be a statement to the effect that same had earned himself
an AP-style contract, if only such a thing existed.
While your point is good, inasmuc
Major Variola writes:
> I don't know about your anecdote, but Mr. May's original point
> was that the law *requires* companies to forget. Which is
> of course an illegitimate intrusion of the state into private affairs.
>
> And the responsibles need killing.
No, they don't.
There are two altern
Well, we talked for a while, and by that time Hoppe knew it was a joke. I said, "Have
times changed? Ive threatened to drag
people around Washington by their nuts behind Oldsmobiles at a hundred miles an
hour. Ive advocated the slaughter of all
politicians. What are the guidelines now?"
