At 06:02 AM 11/25/2003 -0800, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Especially for domains, it's important to do some validation,
though in the absence of widely-deployed DNSSEC, it's hard to
do automatically.
DNSSEC is not happening, [...]
We do not need DNSSEC, we just need a notice in the DNS.
It
Hallam-Baker, Phillip [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DNSSEC is not happening, blame Randy Bush and the IESG for refusing the
working group consensus and imposing their own idea that cannot be deployed.
An experimental protocol that increases the volume of data in the .com zone
by an order of magnitude
Do you have any more details on this for those who don't
normally follow DNSSEC?
It is a sad story. Politics and the magic circle. If people are wondering
why the major industry players have abandoned the IETF read on. This is only
one example of the type, other companies have similar issues.
Hallam-Baker, Phillip [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DNSSEC is not happening, blame Randy Bush and the IESG for refusing the
working group consensus and imposing their own idea that cannot be deployed.
An experimental protocol that increases the volume of data in the .com zone
by an order of magnitude
Do you have any more details on this for those who don't
normally follow DNSSEC?
It is a sad story. Politics and the magic circle. If people are wondering
why the major industry players have abandoned the IETF read on. This is only
one example of the type, other companies have similar issues.
Especially for domains, it's important to do some validation,
though in the absence of widely-deployed DNSSEC, it's hard to
do automatically.
DNSSEC is not happening, blame Randy Bush and the IESG for
refusing the working group consensus and imposing their own
idea that cannot be deployed.
At 04:20 PM 11/21/2003 -0800, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
We need to consider the technical workings of the do-not-spam list and the
requirements that we would like the FTC to meet.
.. [reasonable goals] ... [hashed-form lists instead of plaintext]...
5) Allow domain name owners to list their
Especially for domains, it's important to do some validation,
though in the absence of widely-deployed DNSSEC, it's hard to
do automatically.
DNSSEC is not happening, blame Randy Bush and the IESG for
refusing the working group consensus and imposing their own
idea that cannot be deployed.
: [Politech] Congress finally poised to vote on
anti -spam bill [sp]
We need to consider the technical workings of the do-not-spam
list and the
requirements that we would like the FTC to meet.
I propose as a minimum:
1) Allow individual subscribers to list their email addresses
We need to consider the technical workings of the do-not-spam list and the
requirements that we would like the FTC to meet.
I propose as a minimum:
1) Allow individual subscribers to list their email addresses with the
service.
2) Permit mail sender to quickly determine whether a given email is
We need to consider the technical workings of the do-not-spam list and the
requirements that we would like the FTC to meet.
I propose as a minimum:
1) Allow individual subscribers to list their email addresses with the
service.
2) Permit mail sender to quickly determine whether a given email is
: [Politech] Congress finally poised to vote on
anti -spam bill [sp]
We need to consider the technical workings of the do-not-spam
list and the
requirements that we would like the FTC to meet.
I propose as a minimum:
1) Allow individual subscribers to list their email addresses
12 matches
Mail list logo
