At 11:45 PM 11/7/01 -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
> Go tell that to the Seattle/Portland/wherever wireless people. Or the
>people in rural MN who are putting them up on silos and running a 10 mile
>radius. Totally depends on your topography. And even with p-p they aren't
>doing parabolics, more
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Harmon Seaver wrote:
> Go tell that to the Seattle/Portland/wherever wireless people.
Don't have to, see the commentary about 'if...directional...' Yagi's won't
do that sort of distance either, maybe 3-5 miles.
Blipverts (and probably never having actually touched a wi
Go tell that to the Seattle/Portland/wherever wireless people. Or the
people in rural MN who are putting them up on silos and running a 10 mile
radius. Totally depends on your topography. And even with p-p they aren't
doing parabolics, more like yagi directionals, which could be just another
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Dave Emery wrote:
> I have read reports of people running WiFi links of up to 20
> miles.
ONLY with a high gain parabolic. Not with a omni. Further, all it takes to
find the other dish is look down that line of site.
They're cheap cards, less than $100 each. The 802.1
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 11:01:10PM -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Harmon Seaver wrote:
>
> > Duh! Read it again. "802.11'd to DSL to a very remote web site?" That
> > DSL line could be clear across town.
>
> Not with 802.11 anything will it be 'clear across town'. A few hundred
As someone else mentioned, "Seattle Wireless" scenario, or some form of
packet radio, or Which broadband line would they disconecct? And what
would those people think? Gee, the stock market T1 just went down.
Anyway, so it's broadcasting 802, and the perps already know all the
poss
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Harmon Seaver wrote:
> Duh! Read it again. "802.11'd to DSL to a very remote web site?" That
> DSL line could be clear across town.
Not with 802.11 anything will it be 'clear across town'. A few hundred
yards w/ 802.11b and maybe a mile with 802.11a. Now if you're talking
Fortunately I do not lack the ability to comprehend modern English, but I
do lack the ability to read into a statement what is not there. Even if
your suggestion was intended, that DSL line could be shut down as well,
which was the point my response was intended to address.
-Declan
At 10:45
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Much funnier would be a spray of DMSO mixed with DMT. And reapplyed evertime
Pihkal
--
Day by day the Penguins are making me lose my mind.
Duh! Read it again. "802.11'd to DSL to a very remote web site?" That
DSL line could be clear across town.
Declan McCullagh wrote:
> Yes, but then your clandestine midnight droppers-by could disconnect
> your DSL service in advance. You'd have to couple your DSLcam with a
> remote is-it-alive
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
> Of course you could connect an automated firearm. (Crime Stoppers Note:
> aways aim for the head to avoid protective vests) Any lawyers on the list
> know what penalties might be brought. I seem to recall that tying a
> shotgun to the door knob was ruled an "indescri
Yes, but then your clandestine midnight droppers-by could disconnect
your DSL service in advance. You'd have to couple your DSLcam with a
remote is-it-alive pinging service from a secure location...
-Declan
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 11:40:48AM -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
> >> Of course you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
> Of course you could connect an automated firearm. (Crime Stoppers Note:
> aways aim for the head to avoid protective vests) Any lawyers on the list
> know what penalties might be brought. I seem to recall that tying a
> shotgun to the door knob was ruled an "indescri
13 matches
Mail list logo
