Re: cell phone guns

Petro wrote: > > > Since 9mm is .36 caliber, > > .38 > Nope, it's .357 -- in fact, many are .355. So are all ".38", including .380, .38 short, .38 long, .38 special, etc. except for the .38-40 which is actually .401. -- Harmon Seaver CyberShamanix http://www.cybershamanix.com

Re: CDR: Re: cell phone guns

On Saturday, December 29, 2001, at 06:26 PM, david wrote: > On Saturday 29 December 2001 05:00 pm, Faustine wrote: > >> Hm, whatever works, I guess. Sheer stealth isn't as much a factor for >> me as >> is accuracy, reliability and being able to avoid the "woman with a >> peashooter" image. All

Re: cell phone guns

On Sunday, December 30, 2001, at 06:01 PM, david wrote: > On Sunday 30 December 2001 07:37 pm, Harmon Seaver wrote: > >> Nobody, but nobody, walks around with an empty chamber, whatever >> the caliber. > > Last I heard the Isreali military still did. An empty chamber was US > military stan

Re: cell phone guns

At 8:01 PM -0600 12/30/01, david wrote: >On Sunday 30 December 2001 07:37 pm, Harmon Seaver wrote: > > > Nobody, but nobody, walks around with an empty chamber, whatever > > the caliber. > >Last I heard the Isreali military still did. This is correct- Col. Cooper had some interesting thin

Re: cell phone guns

At 07:37 PM 12/30/01 -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote: > This makes little sense. There are a great many .22 pistols which >have external hammers or an sufficient safety. Why would you have to >rack a slide, other than when you first loaded. With most, if not all, >semi-auto handguns, you always car

Re: cell phone guns

On Sunday 30 December 2001 07:37 pm, Harmon Seaver wrote: > Nobody, but nobody, walks around with an empty chamber, whatever > the caliber. Last I heard the Isreali military still did. An empty chamber was US military standard carry until the switch from 1911 the Beretta. The military w

Re: cell phone guns

This makes little sense. There are a great many .22 pistols which have external hammers or an sufficient safety. Why would you have to rack a slide, other than when you first loaded. With most, if not all, semi-auto handguns, you always carry a round in the chamber anyway, for one, to be read

Re: cell phone guns

At 02:52 PM 12/30/01 -0500, Matthew Gaylor wrote: >At 7:33 AM -0800 12/29/01, David Honig wrote: >>Mossad prefers suppressed Berretta .22 which doesn't need racking. > >Actually they're fond of using the single action Beretta model 70s in >.22lr. I believe that's what arms designer Gerald Bull w

Re: cell phone guns

At 7:33 AM -0800 12/29/01, David Honig wrote: >Mossad prefers suppressed Berretta .22 which doesn't need racking. Actually they're fond of using the single action Beretta model 70s in .22lr. I believe that's what arms designer Gerald Bull was killed with.

Re: cell phone guns

At 08:26 PM 12/29/01 -0600, david wrote: >On Saturday 29 December 2001 05:00 pm, Faustine wrote: > >> Hm, whatever works, I guess. Sheer stealth isn't as much a factor for me as >> is accuracy I don't think the yugo cellphone .22 has been taken to the range by an American gun rag yet... "Thunder

Re: cell phone guns

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 06:54 PM 12/28/01 -0500, Faustine wrote: > >Not surprising, since cell phone holster decoys have been around for ages. >Why settle for a .22 when you could be packing a Glock 30? >Better stealth. >I like the NAA .22 belt buckle. Can also fit insid

Re: cell phone guns

At 03:16 PM 12/28/01 -0800, Eric Murray wrote: >22 caliber four-shot pistol hidden inside a cell phone, uncovered >during police raids in Europe. > >http://abcnews.go.com/sections/world/DailyNews/phone001205.html > >"Cell phone users will have to be made aware that reaching for their >phones in so

Re: cell phone guns

At 06:54 PM 12/28/01 -0500, Faustine wrote: > >Not surprising, since cell phone holster decoys have been around for ages. >Why settle for a .22 when you could be packing a Glock 30? >Like this... Better stealth. I like the NAA .22 belt buckle. Can also fit inside a beeper case. Mossad prefers