Tim has become so proprietary about cypherpunks it's strange
that he's never operated a node himself, or underwritten all of
them in the generous spirit of John Gilmore. Maybe Tim has
been underwriting them quietly and that accounts for his
obnoxious bitching when the discourse doesn't go the way
On Jan 3, 2004, at 3:01 PM, bgt wrote:
(Jeez, I just recently got back onto this list after a several-year
hiatus. How the hell did so many statists ever get the idea that
ubiquitous cryptography would ever further their goals? Or are they
just here to distract us with statism vs liberty type
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: So many statists
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 16:06:35 -0800
On Jan 3, 2004, at 3:01 PM, bgt wrote:
(Jeez, I just recently got back onto this list after a several-year
hiatus. How the hell did so many statists ever get the idea that
ubiquitous cryptography would
On Jan 3, 2004, at 3:01 PM, bgt wrote:
(Jeez, I just recently got back onto this list after a several-year
hiatus. How the hell did so many statists ever get the idea that
ubiquitous cryptography would ever further their goals? Or are they
just here to distract us with statism vs liberty type
Tim has become so proprietary about cypherpunks it's strange
that he's never operated a node himself, or underwritten all of
them in the generous spirit of John Gilmore. Maybe Tim has
been underwriting them quietly and that accounts for his
obnoxious bitching when the discourse doesn't go the way
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: So many statists
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 16:06:35 -0800
On Jan 3, 2004, at 3:01 PM, bgt wrote:
(Jeez, I just recently got back onto this list after a several-year
hiatus. How the hell did so many statists ever get the idea that
ubiquitous cryptography would
