- BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE -
At 05:33 AM 9/13/2004, Ben Laurie wrote:
Bill Stewart wrote:
I find it more annoying that there are spammers putting PGP headers
in their messages, knowing that most people who use PGP assume PGP-signed
mail
is from somebody genuine and whitelist it.
Surely you
At 1:33 PM +0100 9/13/04, Ben Laurie wrote:
>Surely you should check that:
>
>a) The signature works
>b) Is someone in your list of good keys
>
>before whitelisting?
Amen.
A (cryptographic) whitelist for my friends, all others pay cash. :-)
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga
The
Bill Stewart wrote:
At 03:15 PM 9/6/2004, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:52:03AM -0600, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
>
> E-mail security company MX Logic Inc. will report this week that 10
percent
> of all spam includes such SPF records,
I have mentioned this problem more than a year a
At 03:15 PM 9/6/2004, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:52:03AM -0600, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
>
> E-mail security company MX Logic Inc. will report this week that 10 percent
> of all spam includes such SPF records,
I have mentioned this problem more than a year ago in context of
my RM
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:52:03AM -0600, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
>
> E-mail security company MX Logic Inc. will report this week that 10 percent
> of all spam includes such SPF records,
I have mentioned this problem more than a year ago in context of
my RMX draft (SPF, CallerID and SenderID are b
<http://www.eweek.com/print_article/0,1761,a=134748,00.asp>
EWeek
Spam Spotlight on Reputation
Spam Spotlight on Reputation
September 6, 2004
By Dennis Callaghan
As enterprises continue to register Sender Protection Framework records,
hoping to thwart spam and phishing a
