Julian Assange affianted:
>It's wise understand someone's agenda based on their past actions
>and attempts at influence and not the affability of their face.
When I first got within 20 trace aromas of the lushness of Baker's
double cultivated what-grows-wild-elsewhere above his peepers,
my bub
At 03:48 PM 10/18/2001 -0700, Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"FBI requires ISPs to permit easy surveillance; EFF founder agrees"
http://www.politechbot.com/p-02671.html
>"Stu Baker replies to Politech post on ISPs and EFF founder"
http://www.politechbot.com/p-02672.html
>From: "Bak
Huh? I've known Stu for years. I've been on panels with him
(http://www.mccullagh.org/image/950-17/aba-netspionage-broadcast.html)
and have debated him (http://www.politechbot.com/p-02518.html).
I'm hardly being "generous" to say that even evil trial balloons are
ueful to know about.
-Declan
On
At 12:54 AM 10/19/01 -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 05:43:22PM -0700, Greg Broiles wrote:
>> If the FBI really is preparing for a domestic surveillance
initiative,
>> hearing about that months in advance is a lot more helpful than yet
another
>> incompatible peer-to-peer c
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 05:43:22PM -0700, Greg Broiles wrote:
> If the FBI really is preparing for a domestic surveillance initiative,
> hearing about that months in advance is a lot more helpful than yet another
> incompatible peer-to-peer content distribution system.
Greg makes an excellent p
At 10:12 AM 10/19/2001 +1000, Julian Assange wrote:
> > He's a gun-for-hire, not a doctrinaire blinders-on true believer for
> either
> > the surveillance enthusiasts or privacy freaks.
>
>Oh, come off it.
>
>Stu is a well known NSA zealot.
Have you actually spoken with him, or are you just work
> He's a gun-for-hire, not a doctrinaire blinders-on true believer for either
> the surveillance enthusiasts or privacy freaks.
Oh, come off it.
Stu is a well known NSA zealot. The only reason there's a bridge
between Kapor and Baker is due to the cavernous ravine that lays
between them. Kapor
>At 03:48 PM 10/18/2001 -0700, Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>"FBI requires ISPs to permit easy surveillance; EFF founder agrees"
>http://www.politechbot.com/p-02671.html
>
>>"Stu Baker replies to Politech post on ISPs and EFF founder"
>http://www.politechbot.com/p-02672.html
>
>>Fr
At 05:37 PM 10/18/2001 -0700, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>I haven't read the CALEA text in a long time, but I think the answer may
>be yes and no. Stu is a very smart guy, one of the experts on this section
>of the law, but he could conceivably be overstating the case for his own
>purposes.
>
>-D
I haven't read the CALEA text in a long time, but I think the answer may be
yes and no. Stu is a very smart guy, one of the experts on this section of
the law, but he could conceivably be overstating the case for his own purposes.
-Declan
At 05:32 PM 10/18/01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
I've searched for other references to this and haven't found any... I
work at a very large ISP and because of my job function, I would need
to (a) know about such an order; (b) supervise its implementation;
and (c) actively monitor compliance with it.
And I can tell you that we've received no
11 matches
Mail list logo
