Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-26 Thread ken
Tyler Durden wrote: Sounds to me like Al-Qaeda is just getting the most mileage they can out of their little PR Event a couple of years ago. They don't even need to blow up anything to get the most bang for their buck. Hell, in this story the biggest threat was the incompetence of the airline.

Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-26 Thread Jim Dixon
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, ken wrote: Sounds to me like Al-Qaeda is just getting the most mileage they can out of their little PR Event a couple of years ago. They don't even need to blow up anything to get the most bang for their buck. Hell, in this story the biggest threat was the

Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-26 Thread Bill Stewart
At 03:52 AM 7/26/2004, ken wrote: Assuming its true (*) the one security breach is the action of the cabin crew member who tried to reassure this woman by going on about air marshalls. That security breach should certainly get them sacked, and probably interrogated by the men in cheap suits.

Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-26 Thread Jim Dixon
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, ken wrote: Sounds to me like Al-Qaeda is just getting the most mileage they can out of their little PR Event a couple of years ago. They don't even need to blow up anything to get the most bang for their buck. Hell, in this story the biggest threat was the

Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-26 Thread ken
Tyler Durden wrote: Sounds to me like Al-Qaeda is just getting the most mileage they can out of their little PR Event a couple of years ago. They don't even need to blow up anything to get the most bang for their buck. Hell, in this story the biggest threat was the incompetence of the airline.

Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-26 Thread Bill Stewart
At 03:52 AM 7/26/2004, ken wrote: Assuming its true (*) the one security breach is the action of the cabin crew member who tried to reassure this woman by going on about air marshalls. That security breach should certainly get them sacked, and probably interrogated by the men in cheap suits.

Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-17 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 02:19 PM 7/16/04 -0500, Riad S. Wahby wrote: I don't quite know what to make of this. Is it just paranoid rambling? http://www.womenswallstreet.com/WWS/article_landing.aspx?titleid=1articleid=711 What I experienced during that flight has caused me to question whether the United States of

Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-17 Thread Tyler Durden
Variola (ret) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Terror in the Skies, Again? Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:36:21 -0700 At 02:19 PM 7/16/04 -0500, Riad S. Wahby wrote: I don't quite know what to make of this. Is it just paranoid rambling? http

Re: Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-16 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 02:19 PM 7/16/04 -0500, Riad S. Wahby wrote: I don't quite know what to make of this. Is it just paranoid rambling? http://www.womenswallstreet.com/WWS/article_landing.aspx?titleid=1articleid=711 What I experienced during that flight has caused me to question whether the United States of

Terror in the Skies, Again?

2004-07-16 Thread Riad S. Wahby
I don't quite know what to make of this. Is it just paranoid rambling? http://www.womenswallstreet.com/WWS/article_landing.aspx?titleid=1articleid=711 Terror in the Skies, Again? By Annie Jacobsen Note from the E-ditors: You are about to read an account of what happened during