R. A. Hettinga wrote:
--- begin forwarded text
Unless MTAs can reject mail for lack of postage, this approach will not
fix a large majority of the problems of spam. Unless clearing is built
into the protocol, sender pays is a non-starter.
I agree that there are lots of good reasons for sender-pays
At 05:12 PM 3/23/2003 -0500, Jamie Lawrence wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Steve Schear wrote:
>
> > >Unless MTAs can reject mail for lack of postage, this approach will not
> > >fix a large majority of the problems of spam. Unless clearing is built
> > >into the protocol, sender pays is a non-starte
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Steve Schear wrote:
> >Unless MTAs can reject mail for lack of postage, this approach will not
> >fix a large majority of the problems of spam. Unless clearing is built
> >into the protocol, sender pays is a non-starter.
>
> I agree that there are lots of good reasons for sen
At 02:56 PM 3/23/2003 -0500, Jamie Lawrence wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, Steve Schear wrote:
> What part of the infrastructure is being made scarce? You and I aren't
> part of the infrastructure. The selection of a value for our time is just
> another market force at work.
Unless MTAs can reject
