On 29 Sep 2005 09:57:54 -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
One way to build a psuedo-pseudonymous mechanism to hang off of Tor
that would be easy for the Wikipedians to deal with
would be to have a server that lets you connect to it using Tor,
log in using some authentication protocol or other,
then hav
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wikipedia & Tor]
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 10:01:51 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
>Damn good point. Now that I think of it, all the classic examples of
>"anonymous" publication were really pseudonymous. (Publ
>Damn good point. Now that I think of it, all the classic examples of
>"anonymous" publication were really pseudonymous. (Publius, et al)
They have different requirements. Votes and cash transactions and similar
things
require no history, no reputation. They're one-shot actions that should n
- Forwarded message from cyphrpunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: cyphrpunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:44:37 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Wikipedia & Tor]]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of the p
> But now we're back to the question: how can Tor be improved to deal with
> this very serious and important problem? What are the steps that might
> be taken, however imperfect, to reduce the amount of abuse coming from
> Tor nodes?
That's trivial: charge Tor-originated users for editing. That 0
That's trivial: charge Tor-originated users for editing. That 0.0001% (all
three of them) that actually contributes to Wikipedia will be resourceful
enough to create untraceable payment accounts.
...and ensure that all future Tor-originated Wikipedia entries are about
anonymous payments and tra
One way to build a psuedo-pseudonymous mechanism to hang off of Tor
that would be easy for the Wikipedians to deal with
would be to have a server that lets you connect to it using Tor,
log in using some authentication protocol or other,
then have it generate different outgoing addresses based on
- Forwarded message from Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:40:41 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Wikipedia & Tor]]
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
- Forwarded message from David Benfell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: David Benfell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:59:44 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Wikipedia & Tor]]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i
Reply-To:
- Forwarded message from Nick Mathewson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Nick Mathewson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:38:01 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Wikipedia & Tor]]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Quoting Bill Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> One way to build a psuedo-pseudonymous mechanism to hang off of Tor
> that would be easy for the Wikipedians to deal with
> would be to have a server that lets you connect to it using Tor,
> log in using some authentication protocol or other,
> then have
At 05:37 PM 9/27/2005, lists wrote:
Tyler Durden wrote:
Sorry...I don't understand...why would psuedonymity services be provided
within Tor?
I find the concept of having both pseudonymous and anonymous traffic
through TOR quite interesting. In some cases, you really do wish to just
TOR it
- Forwarded message from Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:00:58 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Paul Syverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Wikipedia & Tor
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Mac
- Forwarded message from Geoffrey Goodell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Geoffrey Goodell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:55:41 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Wik
Quoting Alan Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > - Forwarded message from Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> > We are not looking for a perfect solution. Yes, Wikis will be
> > vandalized. We're prepared to deal with that, we do deal with that.
> > But what I am seeking is some efforts to
- Forwarded message from Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:27:12 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Wikipedia &a
> - Forwarded message from Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:50:52 -0400
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Wikipedia & Tor]]
>
> - Forwarded message from Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> We are not looking for a perfect solution. Yes, Wikis will be
> vandalized. We're prepared to deal with that, we do deal with that.
> But what I am seeking is some efforts to think usefully about how to
> helpfully reconcile o
- Forwarded message from Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jimmy Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:50:52 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Wikipedia & Tor]]
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
At 8:37 PM -0400 9/27/05, lists wrote:
> Building a TOR nymspace would be much more
>interesting and distributed.
Since the first time I met Dingledine, he was talking pseudonymity,
bigtime. I was curious when he went to play with onion routers, but maybe
I'm not so surprised anymore...
Cheers,
R
Tyler Durden wrote:
Sorry...I don't understand...why would psuedonymity services be provided
within Tor?
I find the concept of having both pseudonymous and anonymous traffic
through TOR quite interesting. In some cases, you really do wish to just
separate yourself from your meatspace identity
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Wikipedia & Tor]
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:57:50 +0200
- Forwarded message from Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:54:38 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROT
[yes, I know I'm preaching to the choir]
> - Forwarded message from Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> > A potential for cooperation is the proposal below for authenticated
> > access to Wikipedia through Tor. I will not speak to any particular
> > design here, but if Wikipedia has
- Forwarded message from Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:54:38 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wikipedia & Tor
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at
Speaking of "pseudonymity"...
At 12:53 PM -0400 9/27/05, Somebody wrote:
>
>Argh! Not this again!
Yes, again, and I'll keep repeating it until you get it. :-).
>No, "anonymity" is "don't know who sent it".
For some definitions of "who". To paraphrase a famous sink-washing
president, it depends
Quoting "R.A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 8:43 AM -0700 9/27/05, James A. Donald wrote:
> >In the long run, reliable pseudonymity will prove more
> >valuable than reliable anonymity.
>
> Amen. And, at the extreme end of the curve, perfect psedudonymity *is*
> perfect anonymity.
>
> "Charac
At 8:43 AM -0700 9/27/05, James A. Donald wrote:
>In the long run, reliable pseudonymity will prove more
>valuable than reliable anonymity.
Amen. And, at the extreme end of the curve, perfect psedudonymity *is*
perfect anonymity.
"Character. I wouldn't buy anything from a man with no character if
--
From: "Tyler Durden"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A very subtle attack, perhaps? If I were so-and-so, I
> consider it a real coup to stop the kinds of
> legitimate Wikipedia entries that might be made from
> Tor users. And if this is the case, you can bet that
> there are other "o
M. Silvernail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wikipedia & Tor]
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:02:09 -0400
Quoting Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - Forwarded message from Arrakis Tor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> This
Quoting Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - Forwarded message from Arrakis Tor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> This is a conversation with Jimmy Wales regarding how we can get
> Wikipedia to let Tor get through.
> I completely fail to comprehend why Tor server operators consistently
> refuse to
- Forwarded message from Arrakis Tor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Arrakis Tor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 07:48:22 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Wikipedia & Tor
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a conversation with Jimmy Wales regarding how we can
31 matches
Mail list logo