]
Subject: Re: Wired on Secrecy Power Sinks Patent Case
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 23:55:48 -0700
At 09:14 AM 9/20/2005, Tyler Durden wrote:
Very interesting CPunks reading, for a variety of reasons.
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,68894,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1
Of course, the fact
At 09:14 AM 9/20/2005, Tyler Durden wrote:
Very interesting CPunks reading, for a variety of reasons.
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,68894,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1
Of course, the fact that Lucent has been in shit shape financially must
have nothing to do with what is effectively a
At 09:14 AM 9/20/2005, Tyler Durden wrote:
Very interesting CPunks reading, for a variety of reasons.
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,68894,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1
Of course, the fact that Lucent has been in shit shape financially must
have nothing to do with what is effectively a
Very interesting CPunks reading, for a variety of reasons.
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,68894,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1
Of course, the fact that Lucent has been in shit shape financially must have
nothing to do with what is effectively a state-sponsored protection of
intellectual
On 2005-09-20T12:14:13-0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
Very interesting CPunks reading, for a variety of reasons.
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,68894,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1
I'm sick of this mosaic theory being used to justify preventing access
to unclassified information.
--
War is
So if the state hasn't classified my data (and I kinda doubt they will),
then it should be up for grabs by anyone suckin' down the dole?
-TD
From: Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wired on Secrecy Power Sinks Patent Case
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:54:23 +
So if the state hasn't classified my data (and I kinda doubt they will),
then it should be up for grabs by anyone suckin' down the dole?
-TD
From: Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wired on Secrecy Power Sinks Patent Case
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:54:23 +
Very interesting CPunks reading, for a variety of reasons.
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,68894,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1
Of course, the fact that Lucent has been in shit shape financially must have
nothing to do with what is effectively a state-sponsored protection of
intellectual
On 2005-09-20T12:14:13-0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
Very interesting CPunks reading, for a variety of reasons.
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,68894,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1
I'm sick of this mosaic theory being used to justify preventing access
to unclassified information.
--
War is
