--
On 2 Aug 2002 at 0:36, David Wagner wrote:
For instance, suppose that, thanks to TCPA/Palladium, Microsoft
could design Office 2005 so that it is impossible for StarOffice
and other clones to read files created in Office 2005. Would
some users object?
In an anarchic society, or
On Thursday 01 August 2002 15:46, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Dress Code Keeps 9 Hells Angels Out of Fair in Ventura
Security: The new policy is enforced after biker club members refuse
to remove vests marked with group's insignia. Their leader says he
will sue.
Is it just me, or does I'll
--
In an anarchist society, or in a world where government had given
up on copyright and intellectual property, TCPA/Palladium would be
a great thing, a really good substitute for law, much more
effectual, much cheaper, and much less dangerous than law.
In a world where we have
Jon Callas wrote:
On 8/1/02 1:14 PM, Trei, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So my question is: What is your reason for shielding your identity?
You do so at the cost of people assuming the worst about your
motives.
Is this a tacit way to suggest that the only people who need anonymity or
Jon Callas[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On 8/1/02 1:14 PM, Trei, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So my question is: What is your reason for shielding your identity?
You do so at the cost of people assuming the worst about your
motives.
Is this a tacit way to suggest that the only
On 8/1/02 1:14 PM, Trei, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So my question is: What is your reason for shielding your identity?
You do so at the cost of people assuming the worst about your
motives.
Is this a tacit way to suggest that the only people who need anonymity or
pseudonymity are those
--
On 2 Aug 2002 at 10:43, Trei, Peter wrote:
Since the position argued involves nothing which would invoke
the malign interest of government powers or corporate legal
departments, it's not that. I can only think of two reasons why
our corrospondent may have decided to go undercover...
I
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, James A. Donald wrote:
--
On 2 Aug 2002 at 10:43, Trei, Peter wrote:
Since the position argued involves nothing which would invoke
the malign interest of government powers or corporate legal
departments, it's not that. I can only think of two reasons why
our
Sampo Syreeni writes:
On 2002-08-01, AARG!Anonymous uttered to [EMAIL PROTECTED],...:
It does this by taking hashes of the software before transferring
control to it, and storing those hashes in its internal secure
registers.
So, is there some sort of guarantee that the transfer of
