DO NOT FORWARD THIS MESSAGE TO ANY OTHER LISTS. I AM GETTING TIRED OF
SEEING CYPHERPUNKS JUST BE THE DUMPING GROUND FOR STUFF FROM OTHER
LISTS.
In almost all foreseeable cases, a system which allows identity escrow
_cost more_ than a system which does not. This is analogous to the
increased
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 03:10:04PM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Tim,
I AM GETTING TIRED OF SEEING CYPHERPUNKS RESTRICTING WHAT INFORMATION
FLOWS AND TO WHERE IT FLOWS...
He is correct, of course. One of these days I'm going to get
MailMan working, and resurrect cpunx-news.
This list shouldn't
When I got censored by [EMAIL PROTECTED] a couple
of weeks ago I tried to subscribe to these nodes:
Algebra
Infonex
Lne
Minder
Sunder
Pro-ns
Openpgp
Ccc
Subscription was successful only on:
Algebra
Pro-ns
Both of thse provided a who response on 11/10/03 of
Algebra 122
Pro-ns 14
I get the
This mighty wind header of Pro-ns outblows most messages, and appears
to confirm that only Algebra, Lne and Pro-ns are in the X-loop:
Status: U
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from hq.pro-ns.net ([208.200.182.20])
by strange.mail.mindspring.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with ESMTP
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Tim May wrote:
I have several theories/conjectures about what is happening to mailing
lists.
First, a lot of the younger folks--who used to be some of the fresh
blood for lists like ours--are not users of mailing lists. I expect
some of them don't even know such
I think Declan's got the title wrong -
Lessig's discussions that he references aren't about
ending anonymity through escrowed pseudonymity -
they're about replacing some True-Name-based or linkable
applications with pseudonymous ones. For instance,
one-use credit card numbers instead of regular
On Dec 5, 2003, at 3:53 PM, Tim May wrote:
Back to the cost issue. Prof. Lessig argues that voluntary identity
escrow systems should be encouraged. How/ Through nattering to
people about how they ought to use a more expensive, less flexible
system which exposes them to possible danger and which
