At 04:36 PM 2/13/04 +0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
>"retranslating" the stream. This way it may not be technically possible
>for the broadcaster itself to know the number of listeners ->
impossible
>to assess the fees -> impossible to getting reliably proved the number
of
>listeners to. What can ha
[sent to al-q; does [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward there?]
At 06:25 PM 2/12/04 -0500, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
>Among others, /. is reporting that Win2k and WinNT source code may
>have leaked.
The horror, the horror.
>Lots has been said about OSS developers not wanting to look at this
>for fear that they
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 04:36:56PM +0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> FCC recently mandated fees for Internet radio "broadcasters", based on the
You're hailing from .cz, me from .de. Of what relevance is FCC to us?
> number of listeners. However, there are emergent technologies for P2P
> broadcasti
I'll be in the SF/SJ area the week of the RSA conference.
Anyone interested in getting together for dinner one night?
We used to try to schedule a BA Cypherpunks Physical
Meeting to match up with the event, but the PMs seem to
have died out.
Peter Trei
The RSA Security Conference in San Francisco is coming up:
Feb 23-27.
As in the past, free Expo passes are available if you register online at
the conference site: http://2004.rsaconference.com/ (The expo is not
open all days - check the schedule).
Last year, getting a badge required an ID and ge
Wondering a little.
FCC recently mandated fees for Internet radio "broadcasters", based on the
number of listeners. However, there are emergent technologies for P2P
broadcasting, where some of the clients act as broadcasters themselves,
"retranslating" the stream. This way it may not be technical
Riad S. Wahby wrote:
> Lots has been said about OSS developers not wanting to look at this
> for fear that they will be "tainted." While it is true that simply
> the act of looking at the code is unauthorized and illegal, I wonder
> if there is any truth to the claim that a developer who looked at
This came out on lightreading.com. Seems there's one tiny step backward for
CALEA w.r.t Internet telephony. I guess it's obvious the FBI will eventually
get it's way, but it's be interesting to see how it goes about it from here
out.
-TD
At its open meeting today, the FCC took a couple of baby
