-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 9 May 2004, Adam Back wrote:
> and seeing that it is a completely different proposal essentially
> being an application of IBE, and extension of the idea that one has
> multiple "identities" encoding attributes. (The usual attribute this
> a
- Forwarded message from Enzo Michelangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "Enzo Michelangeli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:01:57 +0800
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Axel H Horns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can Skype be wiretapped by the authorities?
X-Mailer: Microsoft O
On Sun, 9 May 2004, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Not only that: NATted agents cannot be "called" unless they first register
> with some reflector on the open Internet. And centralized reflectors are,
> again, easy to attack, and also expensive to operate, as the bandwidth
> requirements are substantial (
At 07:07 AM 5/9/2004 -0400, Adam Back wrote:
>The anonymous IRC project (IIP -- http://www.invisiblenet.net/iip/)
provides encrypted anonymous IRC chat.
>
>Haven't looked in the protocol in detail to see how they get their
anonymity, but the guy seemed aware of Chaum etc and they have crypto
proto
The anonymous IRC project (IIP -- http://www.invisiblenet.net/iip/)
provides encrypted anonymous IRC chat.
Haven't looked in the protocol in detail to see how they get their
anonymity, but the guy seemed aware of Chaum etc and they have crypto
protocols document up there.
They have resource probl
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 08:27:12AM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>
>The former
> Army
>officer, a
> Muslim
Your whitespace cryptosystem sucks.
[copied to cpunks as cryptography seems to have a multi-week lag these
days].
OK, now having read:
> http://isrl.cs.byu.edu/HiddenCredentials.html
> http://isrl.cs.byu.edu/pubs/wpes03.pdf
and seeing that it is a completely different proposal essentially
being an application of IBE, and extension
