Traditionally speaking, Asymetric warfare has almost always been successful.
The best example, of course, is the French exodus from Algeria.
As for sympathisizing with OBL, I agree with you, but then again I've never
been an asymmetric warrior myself. But it seems to me the bombing of that
Indo
Now this might matter. If there's a phone line near the surveilled computer,
then no blackbag op is necessary. Thus, "fishing" is much easier. If they've
got to roll the trucks, then they'll probably need to have something fairly
concrete to nail you with.
-TD
From: John Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECT
Anonymous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>But asymm warfare has to accomplish its goal. It's not being very
>successful.
It's been extraordinarily successful. The US is driving itself (and a lot of
the rest of the world) nuts with terrorists-under-the-beds paranoia. I
recently saw a replay of som
From: "J.A. Terranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Jul 4, 2004 12:57 AM
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Tyler's Education
Interestingly, I have had more than one report of aural acquistion of
typists keystrokes being used to attempt to calculate the content of a
short
- Forwarded message from David Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: David Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 17:28:27 -0400
To: Ip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [IP] Syndicated Dave and Declan... RSS
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Begin forwarded mes
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 09:32:16PM +0200, Anonymous wrote:
>
> Major Variola (ret) writes:
> >
> > The yanks did not wear regular uniforms and did not march in
> > rows in open fields like Gentlemen. Asymmetric warfare means not
> > playing by
> > *their* rules.
>
> But asymm warfare has to acc
