new result: anti-colliding x.509 certificate

2005-04-01 Thread Weger, B.M.M. de
Hi all, Today I announce the construction of a valid X.509 certificate, based on the MD5 hash function, that allows two different digital signatures on the (identical) to-be-signed part. This is based on a new technique of constructing MD5-anti-collisions. For details, see

Your epapers, please?

2005-04-01 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 10:08 PM 3/31/05 +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: government plan to insert remotely readable chips in American passports, calling the chips [2]homing devices for high-tech muggers, So the market for faraday-cages for your passport will grow to equilibrium. A cage will cost less than a buck in

Re: [silk] Google Targeted ads - gmail (fwd from rishab@dxm.org)

2005-04-01 Thread Sarad AV
hi, Maybe it was just a bot parsing the contents of the mail. Cannot say for sure. Reading every ones g-mail doesn't appear to be practical. Sarad. --- Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 09:17 17/03/2005, Biju Chacko wrote: Ok, that does it. I am now convinced that Google is the new

Re: [silk] Google Targeted ads - gmail (fwd from rishab@dxm.org)

2005-04-01 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:17:46AM -0800, Sarad AV wrote: hi, Maybe it was just a bot parsing the contents of the mail. Cannot say for sure. Reading every ones g-mail doesn't appear to be practical. Did you miss the part where Google unofficially admitted storing queries for good? Given

Re: [silk] Google Targeted ads - gmail (fwd from rishab@dxm.org)

2005-04-01 Thread cypherpunk
On Apr 1, 2005 10:57 AM, Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now here's your one stop shop for evil. A position for Google minister for propaganda is about to be posted, so I hear. Let's get this straight. It's not evil if people are voluntarily agreeing to it! Maybe you're being facetious but