On 2005-05-10T08:53:31-0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> If you think this is stupid, just wait till the "Real ID Act" takes
> effect.
There is already a Jesus Christ living in D.C. If it's legal for
someone named Jesus Christ to move to D.C., it should be legal for a
D.C. resident or no-longer resid
Man, that chic's a little dizzy. Good sweater meat, though.
-TD
From: "J.A. Terranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [rationalchatter] Interesting Trial - IRS trial - July 11th (fwd)
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 19:46:34 -0500 (CDT)
-- Forwarded message
I dunno...I don't see a ton of Leitl stuff on the al-qaeda node. That which
does come through seems fairly relevant. I'm thinking Choate and RAH are
tsk-ing his failed attempt at pure stream-of-consciousness posting.
-TD
From: Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [P
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 17:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: marc guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [rationalchatter] Interesting Trial - IRS trial - July 11th
This is an interesting trial. Men with
Yeah...it's pretty fuckin' pointless. Tantamount to proving a guy pointing a
gun at you is actually pointing a gun at you, TO the guy pointing the gun at
you.
-TD
From: "Gil Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [rationalchatter] Interesting Trial - IRS trial - July 11
If you think this is stupid, just wait till the "Real ID Act" takes
effect.
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0xBD4A95BF
"What this country needs is a good old fashioned nuclear enema."
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/05/10/jesus.lawsuit.ap/index.html
Jesus Christ in legal bat
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 17:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: marc guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [rationalchatter] Interesting Trial - IRS trial - July 11th
This is an interesting trial. Men wi
We already have de facto national ID in the form of our state driver's
licenses. They are accepted at face value at all 50 states as well as
by the federal government. Real ID would rationalize the issuing
procedures and require a certain minimum of verification. Without it
we have security that is
On 2005-05-09T12:22:22-0700, cypherpunk wrote:
> We already have de facto national ID in the form of our state driver's
> licenses. They are accepted at face value at all 50 states as well as
> by the federal government. Real ID would rationalize the issuing
> procedures and require a certain minim
A Politech article forwarded email from a liar named <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >From the EE-Times, a between the lines look at the future of RFID tracking:
>
> re: E-passport makers hail U.S. retreat
>
> Junko Yoshida [FAIR USE]
> EE Times
> (04/29/2005 1:38 PM EDT)
>
> PARIS - Global electronic p
On 5/9/05, Sarad AV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If user A has the integer a and user B has the integer
> b, can a zero knowledge proof be developed to show
> that a>b,ahttp://www.cs.huji.ac.il/labs/danss/Fairplay/
CP
On 2005-05-09T19:55:26+, Justin wrote:
> What do we need "security" for? We need security because a lot of
> people hate the U.S., and because we won't close our borders, and
Apparently I have not learned any lessons from the follies of a certain
California governor.
By close the borders, I
On 2005-05-09T12:28:25-0400, Adam Back wrote:
> There is a simple protocol for this described in Schneier's Applied
> Crypto if you have one handy...
>
> (If I recall the application he illustrates with is: it allows two
> people to securely compare salary (which is larger) without either
> party
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:13:18PM -0700, cypherpunk wrote:
> And of course there is Eugen* Leitl, who mindlessly forwards far and
> wide everything that enters his mailbox. I don't know whether we
Consider me bitten by Choate. It's totally incurable.
> should be annoyed or relieved that he fail
14 matches
Mail list logo
