Re: TCPA / Palladium FAQ (was: Re: Ross's TCPA paper)

2002-06-26 Thread Ed Gerck
ised Windows and killed IBM's OS/2 in the process. 3. Embedding keys in mass-produced chips has great sales potential. Now we may have to upgrade processors also because the key is compromised ;-) Cheers, Ed Gerck PS: We would be much better off with OS/2, IMO. Ross Anderson wrote

Re: QuizID?

2002-10-17 Thread Ed Gerck
This solution, like others based on the same principle, may not scale past ~150,000 users because of clock drift problems. Cheers -- Ed Gerck Marc Branchaud wrote: > Any thoughts on this device? At first glance, it doesn't seem > particularly impressive... > > http://www.quizi

not really, Re: Run a remailer, go to jail?

2003-04-01 Thread Ed Gerck
conceal from a communication service provider the existence or place of origin or destination of any human involved in the communication. Humans can't send electrons in the wire, airwaves in the ether -- there is always a piece of technology in-between. Cheers, Ed Gerck

Re: Firm invites experts to punch holes in ballot software

2004-04-08 Thread Ed Gerck
on if that receipt can be used to determine how the voter voted, e.g. by matching a number or pattern on the ballot, even if to the voter. Otherwise, vote selling and coercion cannot be prevented. Cheers, Ed Gerck Ian Grigg wrote: > > Trei, Peter wrote: > > Frankly, the whole online-v

Re: voting

2004-04-15 Thread Ed Gerck
otes under best efforts. Perhaps a trustee could be chosen who would be immune even from a US court order? Well, not for a US election, which is 100% under state and/or federal jurisdiction. But there are additional scenarios -- a bug, Trojan horse, worm and/or virus that infects the systems used by all trustees would also compromise voter secrecy and, thereby, election integrity. Cheers, Ed Gerck

Re: voting

2004-04-16 Thread Ed Gerck
me. You don't have this option when the public at large is considered, for a public election. You can do it in a private election for a club, for example, but even then only if the bylaws allow it. Cheers, Ed Gerck

Re: voting

2004-04-19 Thread Ed Gerck
Yeoh Yiu wrote: > > Ed Gerck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The 'second law' also takes precedence: ballots are always secret, only > > vote totals are known and are known only after the election ends. > > You get totals per nation, per state,

Re: voting

2004-04-21 Thread Ed Gerck
nd silent fraud modes become possible. Coercion and vote selling are just the most obvious. Ed Gerck