Re: voting

2004-04-21 Thread Ed Gerck
fraud modes become possible. Coercion and vote selling are just the most obvious. Ed Gerck

Re: voting

2004-04-19 Thread Ed Gerck
Yeoh Yiu wrote: Ed Gerck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The 'second law' also takes precedence: ballots are always secret, only vote totals are known and are known only after the election ends. You get totals per nation, per state, per county, per riding, per precinct, per polling stion

Re: voting

2004-04-16 Thread Ed Gerck
election. You can do it in a private election for a club, for example, but even then only if the bylaws allow it. Cheers, Ed Gerck

Re: voting

2004-04-15 Thread Ed Gerck
, which is 100% under state and/or federal jurisdiction. But there are additional scenarios -- a bug, Trojan horse, worm and/or virus that infects the systems used by all trustees would also compromise voter secrecy and, thereby, election integrity. Cheers, Ed Gerck

not really, Re: Run a remailer, go to jail?

2003-04-01 Thread Ed Gerck
or place of origin or destination of any human involved in the communication. Humans can't send electrons in the wire, airwaves in the ether -- there is always a piece of technology in-between. Cheers, Ed Gerck

Re: QuizID?

2002-10-17 Thread Ed Gerck
This solution, like others based on the same principle, may not scale past ~150,000 users because of clock drift problems. Cheers -- Ed Gerck Marc Branchaud wrote: Any thoughts on this device? At first glance, it doesn't seem particularly impressive... http://www.quizid.com/ Lovely idea

Re: TCPA / Palladium FAQ (was: Re: Ross's TCPA paper)

2002-06-26 Thread Ed Gerck
Windows and killed IBM's OS/2 in the process. 3. Embedding keys in mass-produced chips has great sales potential. Now we may have to upgrade processors also because the key is compromised ;-) Cheers, Ed Gerck PS: We would be much better off with OS/2, IMO. Ross Anderson wrote: http